By David Kaminski-Morrow 2024-12-23T08:46:00+00:00
Investigators believe a damaged retaining pin within the overhead fire-control panel on a TAP Portugal Airbus A321neo led to an uncommanded in-flight engine shutdown, when it released a fire push-button during turbulence. auxiliary contact function
Portuguese investigation authority GPIAAF says the aircraft (CS-TJL) had been cruising at 37,000ft en route from Milan to Lisbon on 23 October last year.
While the captain was alone in the cockpit – the first officer having left for the lavatory – the jet encountered moderate turbulence. The aircraft subsequently alerted the captain to a shutdown of the right-hand CFM International Leap-1A engine.
After the first officer returned a few seconds later, the crew declared an emergency, commenced a descent to 22,000ft and twice attempted, unsuccessfully, to relight the engine.
The crew diverted to Barcelona where the jet landed safely. None of the 201 occupants was injured.
Source: Olivier Cabaret/Creative Commons
Turbulence during cruise dislodged the right-hand engine’s fire push-button
As the A321neo was parking, the crew noticed that the fire push-button for the right-hand engine had popped from its normal location, and its guard was open.
There had been no fire, and the button did not illuminate. But its release had triggered the automatic shutdown of the engine in flight. This resulted in arming of the extinguishers and an engine-shutdown alert message to the captain.
Airbus’s and TAP’s operating procedures did not require the condition of the overhead fire-control panel to be checked after an in-flight shutdown, says the inquiry.
GPIAAF found that the panel, built in 2009, had originally been installed on an A320.
The inquiry believes the panel was probably dropped at some point, and underwent repair in October 2013 to replace parts and have a distorted base straightened.
Slight deformation of a retaining pin, 10 years after the panel’s repair, caused the button to pop out
TAP received the panel as replacement stock and initially fitted it to one of its A319s before installing it, in 2019, on the A321neo involved in the incident. The panel had logged over 24,500h since the repair.
But GPIAAF indicates that the panel had carried a latent fault – a deformation of less than 6° in the alignment of a fire push-button retention pin – which had gone undetected during repair. The push-button depends on this single pin, just 2mm in diameter, to remain in place.
The inquiry believes the pin’s deformation weakened its ability to retain the fire push-button, and the turbulence experienced by the A321neo was sufficient to cause the button’s release, triggering the engine shutdown.
It points out that the retention system had no redundancy.
Analysis by manufacturer Safran identified 114 fire-control panels with the potential for similar retention-system failure. The inquiry says Airbus and Safran are working to “cleanse” the fleet of affected panels and prevent future installation of units or switches that show signs of damage.
Safran has modified maintenance procedures to include an optical check on the retention pin to ensure alignment within 1°.
Maintenance manuals for Airbus aircraft with line-replaceable fire panels have been updated with a warning not to install panels which have signs of damage, and the airframer has also sought design improvements to increase push-button resilience.
2024-12-30T02:04:00Z By Greg Waldron
South Korea has determined that 179 of the 181 aboard a crashed Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 died in the accident.
The death toll in the fatal crash of a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 at South Korea’s Muan airport has risen to 122 out of the 181 aboard the jet.
2024-12-29T02:05:00Z By Greg Waldron
The Jeju Air 737-800 that crashed at South Korea’s Muan airport attempted to land without its landing gear deployed.
2025-02-05T11:43:00Z By David Kaminski-Morrow
Flight-data recorder traces from the Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 illustrate the extent of damage with which the crew had to cope after the twinjet was crippled by an explosion in Russian airspace. The E190 sustained multiple penetrative impacts – many of them rectangular in shape – from fragments which damaged ...
2025-02-05T01: 53: 00Z By Jon Hemmering
Photographs released by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) show the extent of ground damaged caused by last week’s deadly crash of a Learjet 55, and the state of the jet’s recovered cockpit-voice recorder.
2025-02-04T22:49:00Z By David Kaminski-Morrow
Kazakh investigators have revealed that an Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 experienced two explosions about 25s apart, and lost pressure in all three hydraulic systems, after aborting an attempt to land at the Russian city of Grozny. The aircraft suffered serious flight-control damage and its crew, after considering a number of ...
FlightGlobal is the global aviation community’s primary source of news, data, insight, knowledge and expertise. We provide news, data, analytics and advisory services to connect the aviation community globally and help organisations shape their business strategies, identify new opportunities and make better decisions faster.
dc contactor 48v 200a Site powered by Webvision Cloud