Blog

Frontiers | Pycnogenol® French maritime pine bark extract in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled human clinical studies

Pycnogenol® French maritime pine bark extract is a well-known and thoroughly studied patented extract from the bark of Pinus pinaster Ait. ssp. Atlantica. In 39 randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled (RDP) human clinical trials including 2,009 subjects, Pycnogenol® French maritime pine bark extract supplementation for two weeks to six months has been shown to beneficially affect cardiovascular health, chronic venous insufficiency, cognition, joint health, skin health, eye health, women’s health, respiratory health and allergies, oral health and sports performance. The mechanisms of action that can explain the respective effects on different conditions in the human body are discussed as well. As investigated in several in vitro, in vivo and in clinical studies, Pycnogenol® French maritime pine bark extract showed antioxidative effects, anti-inflammatory abilities, beneficial effects on endothelial function and reinforcing effects on the extracellular matrix. The present review aims to give a comprehensive overview of currently available “gold standard” RDP trials of Pycnogenol®’s benefits across various health domains compared to placebo. In addition, some of the processes on which the presented effects of Pycnogenol® French maritime pine bark extract are based will be elucidated and discussed. This broad overview of RDP studies on Pycnogenol® in different health domains can be used as a basis for further research on applications and mechanisms of this unique French maritime pine bark extract.

There are many pine bark extracts on the market, from different pine tree species, from different countries and with different levels of efficacy for human health (1–4). Pycnogenol® French maritime pine bark extract (Horphag Research) is the most researched pine bark extract with over 450 published studies and over 160 human clinical trials, including over 12.000 subjects (5). mangosteen extract

The French maritime pine trees that are used for Pycnogenol® grow in Les Landes de Gascogne, along the coast of southwest France (6).

Pycnogenol® was found to contain mainly procyanidins, their monomers catechin and epicatechin, taxifolin as well as phenolic acids (6). The total amount of procyanidins in Pycnogenol® is standardized to 70 ± 5% and thus meets the specifications for maritime pine extract, described in the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) (7). Furthermore, after ingestion of Pycnogenol®, taxifolin, catechin, caffeic acid, ferulic acid and metabolite 1 [δ-(3,4-dihydroxy-phenyl)-γ-valerolactone] have been detected in the blood plasma of volunteers (8).

Clinical research on Pycnogenol® started over 40 years ago and various health benefits of Pycnogenol® have been observed and investigated. Due to its specific composition, unique specification and standardization processes, the research results obtained from studies with Pycnogenol® cannot be extrapolated to other pine bark extracts. Many of the studies are conducted following a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled (RDP) methodology to assess the efficacy of the extract in comparison to potential placebo effects.

Pycnogenol® has been shown to have four main effects being its antioxidative effects (9–14), its anti-inflammatory action (15–18), its positive impact on blood circulation (9, 19–24) and its reinforcing effects on the extracellular matrix (25, 26) (Figure 1). Mainly through these mechanisms (27), Pycnogenol® supplementation has been shown in RDP human clinical trials to beneficially affect cardiovascular health (9, 11, 12, 20–22, 28–31), chronic venous insufficiency (32, 33), cognition (13, 14, 34–39), joint health (40–42), skin health (43, 44), eye health (45, 46), women’s health (12, 47, 48), respiratory health and allergies (49–51), oral health (52) and sports performance (53–56) (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Mechanisms of action of Pycnogenol®: antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory abilities, beneficial effects on blood circulation and reinforcing activities on the extracellular matrix. The respective effects of Pycnogenol® that have been observed in different studies are summarized under the main effects. All these mechanisms of action of Pycnogenol® are discussed in this review in more detail in the corresponding chapters. TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; 5-LOX: arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; MMP: matrix metallopeptidases; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells.

Figure 2. Pycnogenol® supplementation has been shown in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled human clinical trials to beneficially affect cardiovascular health, chronic venous insufficiency, cognition, joint health, skin health, eye health, women’s health, respiratory health, oral health and sports performance. These applications of Pycnogenol® are discussed in detail in the respective chapters of this review.

The medicinal use of pine bark from different pine species can be traced back to Hippocrates, 400 B.C. and was applied in many parts of the world (57–60). Traditionally, pine bark has been used for their anti-inflammatory and wound healing effects (57, 61). The anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of Pycnogenol® have since been investigated further which contributed to increased research on the versatile effects of Pycnogenol® on human health, such as joint and respiratory health, cognitive function, menopause, dysmenorrhea and sports (9–18). Furthermore, Pycnogenol® exerts some of its beneficial effects as it optimizes blood flow by improving endothelial function (9, 19–24). Since blood vessels run through all tissues, the effects of Pycnogenol® were investigated in cardiovascular and venous health, as well as skin, hair and eye health. In addition, the composition of multiple constituents of Pycnogenol®, each having different benefits for human health, further explains its broad clinical application (6, 8).

For the first time, this review aims to systematically summarize and discuss these “gold standard” RDP trials comparing the efficacy of Pycnogenol® to placebo and giving explanations for the different effects with the help of the respective mechanisms of action. The discussed studies were obtained from databases (PubMed, SciFinder), using the keyword “Pycnogenol” and “placebo” or “double-blind.”

The RDP human clinical studies conducted with Pycnogenol® are summarized in Table 1, including a brief description of the study details and main findings. As the applications of Pycnogenol® are so diverse, the studies are sorted by health domain and by date of publication.

Table 1. Summary of RDP human clinical studies on Pycnogenol® sorted by applications and by year of publication.

The effects of Pycnogenol® on cardiovascular and endothelial health have been investigated more than any other health condition with ten human clinical RDP studies (9, 11, 12, 20–22, 28–31).

As the endothelium—the inner lining of blood vessels—is actively involved in many physiological functions, like controlling blood pressure, blood clotting and signaling during inflammation, endothelial function is crucial for cardiovascular health (62).

High blood pressure (hypertension) increases the risk of cardiovascular problems, such as heart attack or stroke. Vasoconstriction due to endothelial dysfunction is a common mechanism involved in hypertension related cardiovascular events (63).

In a study at the University of Zurich with 23 patients with coronary artery disease, endothelial function was assessed by measuring the flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery (9). With this method, the widening of the artery in response to elevations in blood flow-induced shear stress was evaluated. 200 mg Pycnogenol® per day or placebo was supplemented in a RDP cross-over study for eight weeks. With Pycnogenol® supplementation, the FMD was significantly improved from 5.3 ± 2.6% to 7.0 ± 3.1% (P < 0.0001), compared to a slight decrease during placebo intake (5.4 ± 2.4% to 4.7 ± 2.0%; P = 0.051). In addition, Pycnogenol®’s antioxidant effects were shown by a significant decrease of 15-F2t-Isoprostane, a marker of lipid peroxidation from 0.71 ± 0.09 pg/ml to 0.66 ± 0.13 pg/ml, with no change in the placebo group.

The improved endothelial function with Pycnogenol® leads to improved vessel relaxation, when needed, which in turn helps to normalize elevated blood pressure. These effects of Pycnogenol® supplementation on blood pressure were investigated in a small RDP crossover study with eleven borderline hypertension patients (28). Pycnogenol® supplementation with 200 mg a day for eight weeks significantly lowered blood systolic blood pressure from 140 to 133 mmHg compared to placebo, which was decreased only marginally. Diastolic pressure was found to be lowered as well after Pycnogenol® supplementation. Interestingly, in subjects with the highest systolic blood pressure at baseline of 150 mmHg, Pycnogenol® supplementation had the greatest relative normalization effect with a reduction to 134 mmHg, which translates to a reduction of 11% compared to baseline.

A study from 2007 investigated the effects of Pycnogenol® on the endothelium-dependent vasodilation by measuring the forearm blood flow in response to acetylcholine, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator (21). In this study, healthy individuals took placebo or 180 mg Pycnogenol® per day for two weeks following a RDP methodology. Forearm blood flow of healthy volunteers in response to acetylcholine significantly increased by up to 41% after Pycnogenol® intake. Placebo had no effect. As a negative control, the forearm blood flow was measured in response to sodium nitroprusside, an endothelium independent vasodilator, which showed no change compared to baseline after Pycnogenol® or placebo intake. These results show that Pycnogenol®’s effects on blood circulation are endothelium dependent.

In a three-month study with 58 hypertensive patients, taking the anti-hypertensive drug nifedipine (a calcium channel blocker), the plasma levels of vasoconstrictor molecule endothelin-1 were significantly lowered by 9% after one month and by 16% after three months in the group taking 100 mg Pycnogenol® compared to the placebo group (20). The concentration of a vasorelaxant molecule (6-keto prostaglandin F1a as an indirect measure of thromboxane concentrations) on the other hand, increased with Pycnogenol® compared to the placebo group. This is a clear indication of improved endothelial function. In the same study, the effects of Pycnogenol® on blood pressure have been investigated as well. Every two weeks, the individual nifedipine dosage was adjusted so that a blood pressure below 130 mmHg was achieved. In the end of the study, 57% of the patients supplemented with Pycnogenol® were able to cut their individual nifedipine medication dosage by half to keep their blood pressure in a healthy range. Only 13% of the placebo patients were able to halve their nifedipine dosage.

Another RDP study reported similar effects in 48 hypertensive patients with type II diabetes, taking an anti-hypertensive drug (an ACE inhibitor) together with 125 mg Pycnogenol® daily or placebo for three months (22). At the end of the study, serum endothelin-1 levels were lowered by 17.8% in the Pycnogenol® subjects compared to baseline and by 20% compared to placebo patients. In addition, 58.3% of the Pycnogenol® patients were able to maintain blood pressure control with half of their hypotensive medication, which was significant compared to only 20% of subjects in the placebo group. The study found a reduction of 12% of LDL cholesterol after three months of supplementation with Pycnogenol®–significantly lower than the levels of the placebo group, which increased by 3% during the three months. In addition, Pycnogenol® was shown to lower glycated hemoglobin by 10% in the Pycnogenol® group, a significant effect compared to placebo. Also fasting plasma glucose levels decreased significantly by 16.7% compared to baseline and by 18.4% compared to placebo. A possible mechanism to understand how Pycnogenol® contributes to lower glucose blood levels could be that sugar absorption was slowed down in patients supplemented with Pycnogenol® by inhibition of α-glucosidase, the enzyme that disassembles starch (64).

In 21 men with moderate erectile dysfunction, supplementation with 120 mg Pycnogenol® per day over a period of three months significantly decreased total cholesterol from 5.41 to 4.98 mmol/L and LDL-cholesterol from 3.44 to 2.78 mmol/L (11). HDL-cholesterol was slightly increased after three months, compared to baseline. Placebo had no effect on cholesterol levels. In addition, Pycnogenol® supplementation increased the antioxidant activity of plasma determined by the FRAP (ferric reducing ability of plasma) method significantly by 15%. Using the “International Index of Erectile Function” (IIEF-5), an improvement of 33% of erectile function was determined after three months of Pycnogenol® intake, while subjects taking placebo experienced a reduction of 21%. Interestingly, improvements in cholesterol levels, antioxidant effects, and erectile function were maintained even one month after termination of Pycnogenol® administration.

A similar RDP study with 53 men with erectile dysfunction showed a decrease of total and LDL cholesterol by 20 and 21%, respectively, in the diabetes mellitus type 2 subgroup taking 120 mg Pycnogenol® daily for three months (29). In non-diabetic subjects, taking Pycnogenol®, total cholesterol decreased significantly by 9% and LDL-cholesterol decreased significantly by 14%. Placebo didn’t change the cholesterol levels in any subjects. As shown before, Pycnogenol® supplementation lowered glucose levels in plasma significantly by 22% in subjects with diabetes mellitus after three months. In addition, erectile function was improved by 45% in diabetes subjects and by 22% in non-diabetic patients after three months of Pycnogenol® intake, assessed with the validated questionnaire International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5).

In a RDP clinical trial with 200 peri-menopausal women, a significant decrease of LDL cholesterol by 9.9% and a significant increase of HDL cholesterol by 4.6% were observed after six months of Pycnogenol® (200 mg) supplementation (12). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly lowered after Pycnogenol® supplementation by 3.9 and 3.5%, respectively, while after placebo systolic and diastolic blood pressures were decreased by 1.7 and 1%, respectively.

A study with 60 subjects with coronary artery disease investigated Pycnogenol®’s effects on microcirculation and platelet function. After four weeks, the diameter of micro vessels at the fingertips and thus microcirculation was significantly increased in 53.8% of the patients supplemented with Pycnogenol® compared to 32% of subjects of the placebo group (31). Furthermore, platelet aggregation was significantly reduced in Pycnogenol® supplemented subjects compared to placebo-controlled people in the study. This was measured by using arachidonic acid and adenosine diphosphate as inducers of platelet aggregation, which were incubated with blood samples of the subjects for three minutes at 37°C.

Another RDP study showed beneficial effects of 100 mg Pycnogenol® daily for twelve weeks on 77 diabetes type II patients, lowering plasma glucose levels significantly (p < 0.01) by 1.96 mmol/l after twelve weeks, compared to placebo (−1.11 mmol/l) (30). This effect was even more pronounced in the patient subgroup with fasting glucose levels above 10 mmol/l at baseline. Values for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) decreased significantly in the Pycnogenol® group after one month. Plasma levels of endothelin-1 were significantly lowered by over 20% with Pycnogenol® while vasorelaxant 6-keto prostaglandin f1 alpha, a marker of PGI2 biosynthesis in vivo was significantly increased by over 10%, compared to placebo (p < 0.01). The researchers concluded “a remarkable recovery of endothelial function.” All patients took anti-diabetic medication in addition to Pycnogenol®.

Two RDP studies on chronic venous insufficiency have shown another interesting clinical application of Pycnogenol® (32, 33) that can be mechanistically explained by its beneficial effects on endothelial function and its anti-inflammatory action (65).

An RDP study with 40 patients investigated the effects of 300 mg Pycnogenol® supplementation per day for two months on subjects with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) (32). Using a semi-quantitative scale to score the symptoms, the results showed that Pycnogenol® significantly relieved swelling (−64%) and heaviness (−54%) in the legs of CVI patients compared to placebo (−7 and −3%, respectively). At the end of the study, 33% of the Pycnogenol® subjects reported the complete disappearance of leg heaviness and 63% did not feel any swelling. All subjects in the placebo group still had symptoms at the end of the study.

In another RDP study on 20 patients with CVI, Pycnogenol® supplementation (300 mg/day for two months) reduced venous pressure significantly by 9.8 and 8.3% (right and left legs, respectively) compared to baseline (33). In placebo subjects, venous pressure was reduced by 6.3 and 0% (right and left legs, respectively) in a non-significant way. Subjective symptoms like feeling of heaviness, swelling, and evening edema were clinically assessed using a four-item scale. After eight weeks, leg heaviness was reported to be reduced by 60.4% in the Pycnogenol® group compared to a reduction of 12.6% in the placebo group. Swelling was reduced by 73.6 and 29% in the Pycnogenol® and placebo group, respectively.

In eight publications on RDP studies investigating the effects on cognitive function, Pycnogenol® has shown to have beneficial effects in all age groups from children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to elderly people with memory-based cognitive challenges (13, 14, 34–39).

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is a brain hyperactivity disorder, and the most common behavioral disorder in children, with an increasing prevalence (66). A common medication for this condition is methylphenidate hydrochloride (MPH), which is associated with various adverse effects (67).

In a recently published RDP clinical trial, 88 children (aged six to twelve) with diagnosed ADHD received either Pycnogenol® (20 or 40 mg/day if < or ≥ 30 kg, respectively; 20 mg/day during the first two weeks), MPH (20 or 30 mg/day if < or ≥ 30 kg, respectively; treatment started with 10 mg/ day, increasing 10 mg per week) or placebo for ten weeks (37). According to the teachers’ rating, hyperactivity and impulsivity were significantly improved by 34% with Pycnogenol®, by 36% with MPH and slightly deteriorated in the placebo group compared to baseline. Inattention was ameliorated as well with both remedies, the effects of MPH being significant versus baseline. The results of the parent’s ratings were similar, with both remedies showing an effect but MPH being significantly more effective on hyperactivity and inattention. However, MPH led to significantly more adverse effects in the children, including mood changes, gastrointestinal symptoms, insomnia, headache, and a feeling of tachycardia. The frequency of adverse events was 39% in the MPH group, 9% in the placebo group and 8% with Pycnogenol®. Additionally, MPH led to loss of appetite and significant weight loss in the children, whereas with Pycnogenol®, a physiologically appropriate weight gain for this age group was observed (38). Interestingly, NPY, “the hunger neuropeptide” responsible for ensuring food intake and reducing anxiety and stress was significantly reduced by 21% after MPH intake and non-significantly increased by 11% in the Pycnogenol® group. The researchers concluded that with the almost complete lack of adverse effects, Pycnogenol® is a good and efficacious alternative for MPH in children’s ADHD, especially in the school environment.

Another RDP clinical study could show that Pycnogenol® intake relieved hyperactivity and improved attention of children with ADHD significantly compared to placebo and to baseline (34). The 61 six- to fourteen-year-old children took 1 mg/kg per day for four weeks. Using four different established questionnaires, symptoms of ADHD were assessed. According to the CAP test (child attention problem), hyperactivity and attention were ameliorated by 18.3 and 14.4%, respectively, as rated by parents and by 16.5 and 10% as rated by teachers. The difference was statistically significant compared to baseline and placebo. In the placebo group, no significant effects were observed. In addition, no side effects after Pycnogenol® supplementation were reported.

Interestingly, the levels of stress hormones (catecholamines) in these ADHD-affected children were influenced by Pycnogenol® supplementation (36). The concentrations of this group of hormones (including adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine), that were five-times higher in children with ADHD compared to healthy children were reduced after Pycnogenol® supplementation for one month. This effect of Pycnogenol® partly explains its mechanism to reduce hyperactivity.

DNA damage was assessed by measuring the levels of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), representing oxidatively damaged purines (14). Oxidative DNA damage was significantly increased in all children with ADHD compared to healthy children. After intake of Pycnogenol®, the levels of 8-oxoG were reduced by 26.2% compared to baseline and by 35.4% compared to placebo.

In addition, Pycnogenol® increased the total antioxidant status (TAS) and improved the glutathione levels, another index for antioxidant capacity in the children with ADHD (14, 35). The level of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was significantly decreased by 22% after Pycnogenol® administration, while reduced glutathione (GSH) was significantly increased by 26.8% after one month and by 36.4% after 2 months compared to baseline (35). The levels of GSSH and GSH were not significantly changed after placebo intake. These results help to further explain Pycnogenol®’s effects on ADHD symptoms by improving the antioxidant status.

In an RDP trial with 101 subjects, between 60 and 85 years with moderate decline of their cognitive function, the effects of 150 mg Pycnogenol® per day for three months on mental performance were investigated (13). The Australian study not only followed the cognitive abilities of the subjects but also their blood profiles. Memory-based cognitive functions, more precisely the spatial working memory and quality of working memory were improved significantly by 10.9 and 8.5%, respectively, with Pycnogenol® compared to placebo. Lipid peroxidation products (plasma F2 isoprostane) were reduced by 22.9% after Pycnogenol® intake and by 3.7% in the placebo group. Impairment in memory skills has been found to be associated with increased age and oxidative stress (68), explaining Pycnogenol®’s effects on cognitive function. These findings support a beneficial effect of Pycnogenol® on cognitive functions in elderly people.

In a small RDP study, the effects of Pycnogenol® on gulf war illness were investigated. Gulf war illness is a chronic and multi-symptomatic disorder affecting military gulf war veterans, with symptoms like fatigue, muscle discomfort, cognitive problems, insomnia, rashes and diarrhea (69). In 20 men, taking 400 mg Pycnogenol® per day for 30 days, the symptoms of gulf war illness were significantly reduced compared to placebo (39). Assessed symptoms were categorized into the six domains fatigue, pain/discomfort, skin, gastrointestinal, respiratory, and neurological/cognitive/mood, including anxiety, depressive and PTSD-related symptoms. The authors concluded that Pycnogenol® may be a promising candidate to further study the effects on gulf war illness.

Joint health is another essential factor for well-being. Osteoarthritis, especially in the knees, hips and hand is a very common joint problem with over half a billion people in the world living with this condition that can affect the ability to move freely (70). Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disorder, causing pain, swelling and stiffness (70). In three RDP studies, Pycnogenol® intake has been shown to act beneficially in patients with osteoarthritis (40–42).

A pilot RDP study with 37 patients with joint cartilage damage in the knee from primary osteoarthritis showed that the intake of 150 mg Pycnogenol® per day for three months led to relieved joint discomfort, with a significant reduction of 43% in self-reported discomfort, 35% in stiffness and 52% in physical function compared to baseline while placebo controls showed no significant changes (40). The difference is statistically significant compared to placebo. The need for NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) or COX-2 inhibitors was high at inclusion with 23.7 ± 8.2 and 25.1 ± 9.7 pills per month for each subject in the placebo and in the Pycnogenol® group, respectively. The intake of pain-relieving drugs increased in the placebo group by 3.8 pills per patient per month and was reduced in the Pycnogenol® group by 15 pills per patient per month at the end of the study.

In another RDP study, 100 patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis in the knee were supplemented with 150 mg Pycnogenol® per day for three months (41). The results of this study confirmed the previous findings of decreased discomfort (by 21.4%), reduction of stiffness in the knee (by 20%) and improved physical function (by 21.7%), in comparison with placebo-controlled subjects. 38% of the included subjects, taking Pycnogenol® decreased their analgesics consumption, while only 8% in the placebo group reduced the dosage.

In another RDP clinical study, 156 osteoarthritis patients, took 100 mg Pycnogenol® day or placebo for three months (42). The discomfort scores decreased by 55% in Pycnogenol®-supplemented subjects and by 11% in placebo-controlled patients. Physical function increased by 56% in the Pycnogenol® group and by 10.4% in the placebo group compared to baseline. In this study, the walking distance on a treadmill was measured as well. At the beginning of the study, all subjects could walk a mean of 65–68 m; after three months, Pycnogenol® supplemented subjects were able to walk a mean of 198 m, which was significantly more than the placebo group with 88 m mean distance.

These effects of Pycnogenol® on joints can be explained by previous findings, showing that regular intake of Pycnogenol® leads to a potent decrease of pro-inflammatory markers like NF-κB and COX-enzymes, as well as a decline in the release of matrix metallopeptidase (MMP) enzymes, that are responsible for destroying cartilage in joints (15–18, 71).

In most cases, joint pain is due to damage to the articular cartilage. Hyaluronic acid contributes to the resistance to compression in cartilage. A small clinical study with 20 healthy volunteers demonstrated that Pycnogenol® intake for four weeks increased gene expression of hyaluronic acid synthase by 44% (25). In addition, the study revealed a noticeable increase in gene expression involved in collagen de novo synthesis. These results are backed up by the finding of a strong increase of the concentration of Pycnogenol®’s metabolites and components in the synovial fluid, surrounding articular cartilage in the joints in osteoarthritis patients (71, 72). Interestingly, Pycnogenol® intake in osteoarthritis patients reduced gene expression of key catabolic and inflammation markers like MMP-3, MMP-13 and IL-1β by more than 50% within knee cartilage (71). This comprehensively explains how Pycnogenol® contributes to restoring health in damaged joints.

A study on skin health and one recently published study on hair quality have shown Pycnogenol®’s effects on beauty and skin health in RDP setups (43, 44).

In a RDP study, Pycnogenol®’s effects on the skin of 78 urban outdoor workers was investigated (43). Water loss of the skin during the hot summer season was significantly reduced by 14% with Pycnogenol® supplementation for three months and only by 5% with placebo. Accordingly, skin elasticity was shown to be improved by 13% after supplementation, compared to an increase of 1% in the placebo group.

During the dry autumn season, Pycnogenol® helped achieve a more even skin tone by 7.2% after six weeks and by 13.8% after twelve weeks of supplementation. These effects were statistically significant versus the placebo control. In the placebo group, subjects experienced a decrease in skin tone regularity because of pollution and sun radiation during the dry season. Skin tone regularity was assessed on the cheeks of the participants by the individual typology angle (ITA°), which is an objective classification of the skin tone in dermatology and cosmetology.

Several mechanisms behind Pycnogenol®’s effects on skin have been elucidated (25, 26, 73). Clinical investigations of Pycnogenol® supplementation for twelve weeks in women aged 55 to 68 years found increased hyaluronic acid synthase mRNA levels by 44% and collagen type 1 mRNA levels by 40% in skin biopsies (25). These mechanisms explain the effects of Pycnogenol® on skin hydration and elasticity.

Another study investigated the depigmenting action of Pycnogenol® and found a significant reduction of the tyrosinase activity by 66.5%. Tyrosinase is an enzyme that activates the production of melanin, responsible for melasma in skin. In addition, Pycnogenol® downregulated other pigmentation-related mediators in UV-light treated human melanocytes (73). Pycnogenol®’s ability to counteract skin hyperpigmentation was clinically validated in another study (26). In this clinical trial with 20 women, oral supplementation with Pycnogenol® was shown to significantly lower UV-induced expression of the pigment synthesizing enzymes TRP1 by 75%, tyrosinase by 51%, MITF by 67% and MART-1 by 67%. These markers are associated with long-lasting pigmentation. From these results, it was concluded that Pycnogenol® “contributes to the inhibition of pathways associated with skin hyperpigmentation” (26, 73).

A recently published RDP study identified Pycnogenol® as a natural, safe and effective supplement for women who face hair thinning (44). 76 healthy menopausal women between 45 and 60 years were randomly assigned to either take 150 mg Pycnogenol® per day or placebo for six months.

Remarkably, oral intake of Pycnogenol® led to a significant increase of hair density of 30%, compared to baseline and of 15% compared to placebo after two months. The effects of Pycnogenol® stayed on a highly improved level after six months of supplementation.

In addition, the study showed that Pycnogenol® significantly reduced water loss from the skin of subjects’ scalp, compared to the placebo group. This leads to a better regulated scalp skin moisture balance for healthier hair and scalp.

The study also confirmed that Pycnogenol® intake positively affects microcirculation in the skin. Using photoplethysmography, Pycnogenol® was found to decrease resting flux in the scalp by 21.7% after two, and by 43.5% after six months. In the placebo subjects, the observed decrease was only 5.1 and 20.5%, respectively. This effect of Pycnogenol® leads to a better supply of nutrients and oxygen to hair follicles. In several previously published studies, Pycnogenol® was shown to improve circulation in small blood vessels in the body, like the very fine micro vessels in the fingertips or in the retinal capillaries of the eye (31, 46). In addition to an improvement of microcirculation, two other mechanisms of action explain Pycnogenol®’s efficacy for hair health and beauty. Pycnogenol®’s anti-inflammatory (15–18) and antioxidant activities (9–14) contribute to protecting hair follicles by capturing free radicals, generated either by stress, sun rays, pollution, or inflammation.

Owing to its effects on microcirculation, inflammation and oxidation, Pycnogenol® was found to have positive effects on eye health (45, 46). As the retina is the tissue with the highest metabolic rate in the body, it is particularly susceptible to oxidative stress. The eye tissue is particularly exposed to UV light which generates reactive oxygen species in cells. Furthermore, metabolic conditions like diabetes involve a pathological oxidative stress, which can lead to diabetic retinopathy (74).

Pycnogenol® showed effects to stop further progression of retinopathy and ameliorate the eyesight of diabetics by stabilizing and sealing leaky capillaries of the retina, stopping further outflow of blood (45, 46).

In an RDP study, Pycnogenol® was shown to reduce capillary leaking in the eyes (45). Using fluorescein angiography as a measurement tool, vascular permeability was found to have decreased by 16 and 23% for left and right eye, respectively, compared to baseline. Retinal vascularization and the presence of macular edema was assessed by ophthalmoscopy, determining the severity of retinal damage. After Pycnogenol® supplementation for two months, the ophthalmoscopy score significantly improved by 9% in the left eyes and by 17% in the right eyes compared to baseline, whereas there was no change observed in the placebo group. Furthermore, Pycnogenol® supplementation led to increased visual acuity by 5.7% (left eye) and 7% (right eye). The improvement was statistically significant compared to placebo. Whereas, with placebo treatment, retinopathy continued to progress as the visual acuity was reduced by 3.2% (left) and 7.5% (right), assessed by the Snellen Chart.

Another study showed that Pycnogenol® reduced retinal edema and improved visual acuity in early diabetic retinopathy (46). The score assessing retinal edema was significantly reduced by 30% in mild edema cases and by 35% in moderate edema cases compared to placebo patients after three months of Pycnogenol® supplementation. The retinal thickness, assessed by high resolution ultrasound, significantly decreased by 11% in mild cases and by 25% in moderate cases in Pycnogenol® subjects. The most significant outcome observed in this study was the improvement of the visual acuity by 21% in Pycnogenol® patients compared to baseline and placebo patients, which was assessed with the Snellen chart. Furthermore, the retinal blood flow was improved by around 30% after Pycnogenol® supplementation.

Pycnogenol®’s effects on endothelial function (9) might explain the observed effects on perfusion of the retinal tissue and the resulting restoration of vision loss in diabetic retinopathy patients.

Investigating the efficacy of Pycnogenol® on the health of women, two RDP studies on menopausal symptoms (12, 47) and one on menstrual discomfort (48) have been performed.

An RDP study with 155 peri-menopausal women found the menopause symptoms assessed by the Women’s Health Questionnaire (WHQ) to be significantly improved after six month of Pycnogenol® supplementation, as compared to placebo controls (12). The symptoms on the WHQ include somatic (tiredness, headache) and vasomotor problems (hot flashes, sweating), depressed mood, memory and concentration issues, attractiveness, anxiety, sexual behavior (including vaginal dryness), sleep, and menstrual problems. Already after one month, all symptoms of the Pycnogenol® supplemented subjects were significantly improved compared to enrollment and most items significantly compared to placebo. In the placebo group, several symptoms also improved significantly compared to baseline after one month, however, after six months, only memory/concentration remained significantly increased compared to baseline. Interestingly, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as LDL-cholesterol levels were found to be significantly reduced after 6 months of Pycnogenol® supplementation, compared to placebo. The increase of total antioxidant status, measured as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity, after Pycnogenol® intake was highly significant compared to baseline and placebo. From these results, the authors attributed a positive, protective role to Pycnogenol® on the vascular health of peri-menopausal women, which also “clearly reduced the frequency as well as the severity of climacteric symptoms” (12).

Significant efficacy of a low dosage of Pycnogenol® (60 mg daily) on climacteric symptoms could be shown in an RDP investigation with 170 women (47). In this study, the total menopause symptom score of the women was reduced by 17% compared to placebo control after three months. Vasomotor symptoms (including hot flashes), sleep problems and fatigue were significantly improved in the Pycnogenol® group compared to placebo. After three months, no significant effects on blood pressure or cholesterol levels were detected but positive trends were observed. In this study, blood plasma levels of different sexual hormones were investigated as well. Interestingly, after Pycnogenol® intake, none of the hormone levels showed significant changes compared to baseline or placebo, suggesting non-hormonal mechanisms of Pycnogenol® on climacteric symptoms.

The results from these studies demonstrated interesting efficacy of Pycnogenol® supplementation in addressing various climacteric symptoms. The underlying mechanism has not been investigated fully yet, however, Pycnogenol®’s validated effects on blood circulation and endothelial health are good explanations for its beneficial effects on symptoms like hot flashes and sexual behavior.

An RDP multicenter study from 2008 showed that Pycnogenol® supplementation significantly reduced abdominal discomfort in women with dysmenorrhea (48). The women took Pycnogenol® for two menstrual cycles, during which they needed significantly less analgesic medication than in the registration period of two months before supplementation (−46%) and less than placebo controls (−28%). Interestingly, after discontinuing Pycnogenol® and placebo intake in the fifth cycle of the study, subjects of the Pycnogenol® group reported a continuation of the trend, as their need for analgesics was even more reduced (−50% compared to baseline), while women of the placebo group experienced a rapid return to analgesics. The number of days on which analgesics were required was significantly reduced with Pycnogenol® from 2.1 to 1.3 days and changed less in the placebo group, from 1.9 to 1.7 days.

Inflammatory processes were found to be a key mechanism in dysmenorrhea (75). During menstruation, the tissue lining of the uterine cavity is replaced, leading to wound healing and inflammation. As mentioned before, Pycnogenol® was shown to have potent anti-inflammatory activities in several studies (15–18).

Chronic respiratory diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma and pulmonary hypertension are among the five disease areas with the highest global mortality and morbidity rates (76). With almost 300 million people affected, asthma is one of the most common respiratory diseases worldwide (77). Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that can be triggered by allergies, by medication such as aspirin or it can arise within the body through yet unclear molecular mechanisms (78). Recurrent episodes of coughing, shortness of breath, wheezing and chest tightness are typical symptoms for asthma (79).

Supplementation with Pycnogenol® has been shown to have several beneficial effects on asthma and allergic rhinitis symptoms (49–51). Especially Pycnogenol®’s anti-inflammatory effects are suggested to be responsible for its anti-allergic and anti-asthma efficacy.

In an RDP cross-over study, the effects of Pycnogenol® supplementation for four weeks on 22 chronic asthma patients were investigated (49). The patients’ lung function was assessed by analysis of the “forced expiration volume in one second” (FEV1), representing the percentage of lung volume exhaled in a second. In asthmatics, the FEV1 is generally reduced as their breathing is restricted. After Pycnogenol® supplementation, the all-adult patients could exhale 70% of their lung volume as compared to 59% at trial start and 63% in response to placebo. Additionally, the study participants rated their asthma symptoms regarding severity. Four weeks of Pycnogenol® intake led to a reduction of symptom severity by 20%, whereas it was reduced by 4.5% in placebo subjects. Furthermore, Pycnogenol® supplementation significantly reduced pro-inflammatory mediators (leukotrienes) in the blood of patients, as compared to both baseline values and placebo.

Most asthmatics develop the disease already during childhood, often before the age of five years. An RDP study investigated the effects of Pycnogenol® on 60 children aged six to eighteen years with mild to moderate asthma (50). The study showed that the breathing capacity improved significantly already after one month of Pycnogenol® supplementation, as assessed by measuring FEV1. The severity of asthma symptoms as well as leukotriene levels in the urine decreased drastically after one month of Pycnogenol® intake and further decreased significantly throughout the trial period. The treatment with placebo had no significant effect on leukotriene levels or asthma symptoms. Another interesting outcome of the study is the reduced necessity of using albuterol rescue inhalers as severe asthma attacks appeared less frequently. After one month, eight out of thirty children taking Pycnogenol® didn’t require rescue inhalers anymore and eighteen children were completely off the inhaler after the three-month supplementation with Pycnogenol®.

In an RDP trial, researchers found that Pycnogenol® supplementation improved allergic rhinitis symptoms from birch and other pollen allergy when the supplementation started at least five weeks before the pollen season (51). Eye symptoms decreased by 35% and nasal symptoms by 20.5% compared to placebo. The number of patients requiring rescue antihistamines was 26% lower in the Pycnogenol® group than in the placebo group.

A study on oral health, specifically on persistent malodor (halitosis) was conducted with Pycnogenol® (52). The 21 healthy participants used either two placebo gums or two gums with 2.5 mg Pycnogenol® each, six times daily for 15 min each. After two weeks of Pycnogenol® gum usage, the levels of volatile sulfur compounds (hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan and dimethyl sulfide) were significantly reduced compared to baseline and after four weeks, these levels were reduced significantly compared to placebo. In addition, the Pycnogenol® group had a lowered tongue-coating score and significantly reduced hydrogen sulfide-producing bacteria in saliva after four weeks. The mechanism behind these effects has been suggested to be the previously observed bacteriostatic properties of Pycnogenol® (80).

In four RDP investigations, Pycnogenol® supplementation was shown to enhance sport endurance and performance (53–56).

An RDP crossover study found that the endurance time of a group of recreational athletes was significantly increased after Pycnogenol® supplementation (53). For the measurements, the subjects performed on a treadmill with individual setting adjusted to 85% of a person’s maximal oxygen consumption. The 20 to 35 years old participants received 200 mg Pycnogenol® per day or placebo for 30 days, then switched to the other group for another 30 days. Endurance was evaluated by measuring the running time in seconds on the treadmill after 30 and after 60 days. The composite performance time of the Pycnogenol® groups increased significantly by 23.2% compared to baseline and by 7.1% compared to placebo. The time of placebo subjects was increased by 15% compared to baseline.

A small RDP study with nine trained 25 to 45 year old cyclists examined the effects of a single dose of a fitness drink with Pycnogenol® as the only active ingredient on performance (54). The placebo drink consisted of the same ingredients (pineapple pulp, molasses, sodium chloride, flavor, steviol glycosides, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate), except Pycnogenol®. The study protocol included two separate sets of training of five min cycling at 50% peak power output (PPO), eight min at 70% PPO and cycling until fatigue at 95% PPO. The Pycnogenol® or placebo drink was consumed four hours before the training. On average, the Pycnogenol® supplemented cyclists rode 80 s longer until they reached exhaustion compared to subjects, taking a placebo drink. In addition, considerable evidence was given for positive effects of Pycnogenol® intake on performance related variables like the rating of perceived exertion, heart rate and blood lactate concentration at 70% PPO.

In a similar RDP study, 15 resistance trained subjects in their twenties took a single dose of the same fitness drink, containing Pycnogenol® as the active ingredient (55). The participants consumed the placebo or Pycnogenol® drink four hours prior to a lower limb hypertrophic resistance training, consisting of six sets of 70% of the individual’s repetition maximum of back squats. This exercise was repeated at a second visit. The researchers found improved muscle contractile performance after the Pycnogenol® drink supplementation during resistance training compared to a placebo drink. Accumulated power output after Pycnogenol® intake was significantly higher by 4% compared to placebo controls. Over the course of the six sets, power and velocity during the resistance training sessions was stable after Pycnogenol® intake but was reduced significantly with each set in the placebo group.

Another RDP study with six trained and seven untrained subjects investigated NAD+/NADH levels after continuous progressive exercise and after having taken the fitness drink with Pycnogenol® or placebo (56). The training setup was comparable to the cycling training in the study of Bentley et al. (54). The physical work capacity until fatigue was increased by 17% in the Pycnogenol® group compared to placebo. In addition, serum NAD+ levels were increased significantly with the Pycnogenol® drink compared to placebo drink in trained and untrained subjects.

These results confirm the antioxidant properties of Pycnogenol® and its protection against the high post-exercise oxidative stress.

There are several underlying mechanisms of Pycnogenol® to explain these effects. During exercise, heart rate, blood flow and ventilation rapidly accelerate, and to do so, the cardio-pulmonary system adjusts to allow more nutrients, energy and oxygen to muscle tissues and avoid anaerobic build-up of lactic acid. Sufficient muscle oxygenation is facilitated by relaxed blood vessels and improved blood flow, which warrants aerobic energy generation. This increase in oxygen supply translates into acute oxidative stress due to higher production of free radicals in blood and muscles (81). As mentioned before, Pycnogenol® was shown to have potent antioxidant efficacy and protects lipids, DNA and proteins from oxidation within the body in addition to its ability to increase blood antioxidant capacity (9–14).

Another property of Pycnogenol® explaining its effect of increased performance is the improved tissue perfusion by enhancing microcirculation (31) and its effects on endothelial function (9, 19–24) contributing to improved blood flow by relaxing blood vessels.

Pycnogenol®’s unique composition of bioactive substances with diverse biological targets explains its efficacy on a broad range of human health conditions. The mechanisms of action of Pycnogenol® were explored in several in vitro, in vivo and in clinical studies over the years (27). Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled (RDP) clinical trials help clarify and confirm some of the mechanisms of action of Pycnogenol® at the molecular level. The protective effects of Pycnogenol® on DNA, protein or lipid oxidation as well as its effects on blood antioxidant capacity were validated in several RDP studies on cardiovascular health, on cognitive function in older and young people, on menopause and on sports (9, 11–14, 56). Anti-inflammatory action of Pycnogenol®, like the reduction of inflammation mediators was shown in RDP trials on joint health as well as on respiratory health (40, 49). Pycnogenol®’s favorable impact on blood circulation was demonstrated in multiple ways, like the improvement of endothelial function or microcirculation in clinical RDP trials on cardiovascular health, chronic venous insufficiency, on skin and hair health, eye health and menopause (9, 11, 12, 20–22, 28–33, 43–47). Improved skin elasticity, skin moisture, joint flexibility and hair health illustrate the beneficial effects of Pycnogenol® on the extracellular matrix, observed in RDP studies (40–44). The complementarity of these mechanisms justifies Pycnogenol®’s positive effects on its largely diversified areas of application.

Due to its unique production process and the sole usage of the plant species of Pinus pinaster Ait. ssp. Atlantica specific to the forest in Les Landes de Gascogne in France, the standardized pine bark extract registered as Pycnogenol® stands unparalleled when compared with other pine bark extracts. The presented studies all used Pycnogenol® supplementation and the obtained results cannot be extrapolated to other plant or pine bark extracts (5).

There are still gaps of knowledge on the exact mechanisms of action for some of the health applications of Pycnogenol®. In-depth investigations into the actions of the components and metabolites within cells are crucial. This not only enhances our comprehension of the effects of Pycnogenol® in established fields but also opens avenues for exploring novel approaches to harness its potential benefits for human health. To unveil the full spectrum of bioactive metabolites and components in the human body, further investigations are warranted to pinpoint the most active compounds. Presently, only a limited number of bioactive metabolites of Pycnogenol® have been identified. Utilizing advanced methods and expanded measurement capabilities in future research endeavors will undoubtedly reveal the comprehensive profile of active metabolites following the consumption of Pycnogenol®.

FW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PR: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

FW was an employee of Horphag Research.

The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

1. Karaçelik AA, Şeker ME, Karaköse M. Determination of antioxidant activity of different extracts from bark of Pinus spp. grown in Giresun (Turkey) province – phenolic analysis by RP-HPLC-DAD. KSU J Agric Nat. (2022) 25:10–8. doi: 10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.875313

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Dridi W, Bordenave N. Pine bark phenolic extracts, current uses, and potential food applications: A review. Curr Pharm Des. (2020) 26:1866–79. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200212113903

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lee EL, Barnes J. Pine bark. J Prim Health Care. (2023) 15:192–4. doi: 10.1071/HC23064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Li YY, Feng J, Zhang XL, Cui YY. Pine bark extracts: Nutraceutical, pharmacological, and toxicological evaluation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2015) 353:9–16. doi: 10.1124/jpet.114.220277

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Oliff H. Scientific and clinical monograph for Pycnogenol. Austin, TX: American Botanical Council (2019). p. 1–46.

6. Rohdewald P. A review of the French maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol), a herbal medication with a diverse clinical pharmacology. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. (2002) 40:158–68. doi: 10.5414/CPP40158

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. The United States Pharmacopeia. USP monograph. Maritime pine extract. (Vol. 39). North Bethesda, MD: The United States Pharmacopeia (2016). p. 6748–9.

8. Grimm T, Skrabala R, Chovanova Z, Muchova J, Sumegova K, Liptakova A, et al. Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol) after oral administration to healthy volunteers. BMC Clin Pharmacol. (2006) 6:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-6-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Enseleit F, Sudano I, Periat D, Winnik S, Wolfrum M, Flammer AJ, et al. Effects of Pycnogenol on endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Eur Heart J. (2012) 33:1589–97. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr482

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Devaraj S, Vega-Lopez S, Kaul N, Schonlau F, Rohdewald P, Jialal I. Supplementation with a pine bark extract rich in polyphenols increases plasma antioxidant capacity and alters plasma lipoprotein profile. Lipids. (2002) 37:931–4. doi: 10.1007/s11745-006-0982-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. D̆uračková Z, Trebatický B, Novotný V, Žitňanová I, Breza J. Lipid metabolism and erectile function improvement by Pycnogenol®, extract from the bark of Pinus pinaster in patients suffering from erectile dysfunction-a pilot study. Nutr Res. (2003) 23:1189–98. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00126-X

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Yang HM, Liao MF, Zhu SY, Liao MN, Rohdewald P. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the effect of Pycnogenol on the climacteric syndrome in peri-menopausal women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (2007) 86:978–85. doi: 10.1080/00016340701446108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ryan J, Croft K, Mori T, Wesnes K, Spong J, Downey L, et al. An examination of the effects of the antioxidant Pycnogenol® on cognitive performance, serum lipid profile, endocrinological and oxidative stress biomarkers in an elderly population. J Psychopharmacol. (2008) 22:553–62. doi: 10.1177/0269881108091584

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chovanova Z, Muchova J, Sivonova M, Dvorakova M, Zitnanova I, Waczulikova I, et al. Effect of polyphenolic extract, Pycnogenol, on the level of 8-oxoguanine in children suffering from attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Free Radic Res. (2006) 40:1003–10. doi: 10.1080/10715760600824902

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Canali R, Comitato R, Schonlau F, Virgili F. The anti-inflammatory pharmacology of Pycnogenol in humans involves COX-2 and 5-LOX mRNA expression in leukocytes. Int Immunopharmacol. (2009) 9:1145–9. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.06.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Grimm T, Chovanova Z, Muchova J, Sumegova K, Liptakova A, Durackova Z, et al. Inhibition of NF-kappaB activation and MMP-9 secretion by plasma of human volunteers after ingestion of maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol). J Inflamm. (2006) 3:1. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-3-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Grimm T, Schäfer A, Högger P. Antioxidant activity and inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases by metabolites of maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol). Free Radic Biol Med. (2004) 36:811–22. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2003.12.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Schäfer A, Chovanova Z, Muchova J, Sumegova K, Liptakova A, Durackova Z, et al. Inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 activity by plasma of human volunteers after ingestion of French maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol). Biomed Pharmacother. (2005) 60:5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2005.08.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Fitzpatrick DF, Bing B, Rohdewald P. Endothelium-dependent vascular effects of Pycnogenol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. (1998) 32:509–15. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199810000-00001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Liu X, Wei J, Tan F, Zhou S, Wurthwein G, Rohdewald P. Pycnogenol, French maritime pine bark extract, improves endothelial function of hypertensive patients. Life Sci. (2004) 74:855–62. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.07.037

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Nishioka K, Hidaka T, Nakamura S, Umemura T, Jitsuiki D, Soga J, et al. Pycnogenol, French maritime pine bark extract, augments endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans. Hypertens Res. (2007) 30:775–80. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.775

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zibadi S, Rohdewald PJ, Park D, Watson RR. Reduction of cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes by Pycnogenol supplementation. Nutr Res. (2008) 28:315–20. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2008.03.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Uhlenhut K, Högger P. Facilitated cellular uptake and suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase by a metabolite of maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol). Free Radic Biol Med. (2012) 53:305–13. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.04.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kurlbaum M, Mülek M, Högger P. Facilitated uptake of a bioactive metabolite of maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol) into human erythrocytes. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e63197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063197

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Marini A, Grether-Beck S, Jaenicke T, Weber M, Burki C, Formann P, et al. Pycnogenol(R) effects on skin elasticity and hydration coincide with increased gene expressions of collagen type I and hyaluronic acid synthase in women. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. (2012) 25:86–92. doi: 10.1159/000335261

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Grether-Beck S, Marini A, Jaenicke T, Krutmann J. French maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol(R)) effects on human skin: Clinical and molecular evidence. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. (2016) 29:13–7. doi: 10.1159/000441039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

[ PubMed ] 27. Nattagh-Eshtivani E, Gheflati A, Barghchi H, Rahbarinejad P, Hachem K, Shalaby MN, et al. The role of Pycnogenol in the control of inflammation and oxidative stress in chronic diseases: Molecular aspects. Phytother Res. (2022) 36:2352–7 doi: 10.1002/ptr.7454

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Hosseini S, Lee J, Sepulveda RT, Rohdewald P, Watson RR. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective, 16 week crossover study to determine the role of Pycnogenol in modifying blood pressure in mildly hypertensive patients. Nutr Res. (2001) 21:1251–60. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(01)00342-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Trebaticky B, Muchova J, Ziaran S, Bujdak P, Breza J, Durackova Z. Natural polyphenols improve erectile function and lipid profile in patients suffering from erectile dysfunction. Bratisl Med J. (2019) 120:941–4. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2019_158

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Liu X, Wei J, Tan F, Zhou S, Wurthwein G, Rohdewald P. Antidiabetic effect of Pycnogenol® French maritime pine bark extract in patients with diabetes type II. Life Sci. (2004) 75:2505–13. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.10.043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Wang S, Tan D, Zhao Y, Gao G, Gao X, Hu L. The effect of Pycnogenol® on the microcirculation, platelet function and ischaemic myocardium in patients with coronary artery diseases. Eur Bull Drug Res. (1999) 7:19–25.

32. Arcangeli P. Pycnogenol in chronic venous insufficiency. Fitoterapia. (2000) 71:236–44. doi: 10.1016/S0367-326X(99)00164-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Petrassi C, Mastromarino A, Spartera C. Pycnogenol in chronic venous insufficiency. Pyctomedicine. (2000) 7:383–8. doi: 10.1016/S0944-7113(00)80059-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Trebaticka J, Kopasova S, Hradecna Z, Cinovsky K, Skodacek I, Suba J, et al. Treatment of ADHD with French maritime pine bark extract, Pycnogenol. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2006) 15:329–35. doi: 10.1007/s00787-006-0538-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Dvorakova M, Sivonova M, Trebaticka J, Skodacek I, Waczulikova I, Muchova J, et al. The effect of polyphenolic extract from pine bark, Pycnogenol on the level of glutathione in children suffering from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Redox Rep. (2006) 11:163–72. doi: 10.1179/135100006X116664

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Dvorakova M, Jezova D, Blazicek P, Trebaticka J, Skodacek I, Suba J, et al. Urinary catecholamines in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Modulation by a polyphenolic extract from pine bark (Pycnogenol). Nutr Neurosci. (2007) 10:151–7. doi: 10.1080/09513590701565443

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Weyns A-S, Verlaet AAJ, Breynaert A, Naessens T, Fransen E, Verhelst H, et al. Clinical investigation of French maritime pine bark extract on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as compared to methylphenidate and placebo: Part 1: Efficacy in a randomised trial. J Funct Foods. (2022) 97:105246. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.105246

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Weyns A-S, Verlaet AAJ, Van Herreweghe M, Breynaert A, Fransen E, De Meester I, et al. Clinical investigation of French maritime pine bark extract on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as compared to methylphenidate and placebo: Part 2: Oxidative stress and immunological modulation. J Funct Foods. (2022) 97:105247. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.105247

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Donovan EK, Kekes-Szabo S, Lin JC, Massey RL, Cobb JD, Hodgin KS, et al. A placebo-controlled, pseudo-randomized, crossover trial of botanical agents for gulf war illness: Curcumin (Curcuma longa), Boswellia (Boswellia serrata), and French maritime pine bark (Pinus pinaster). Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:2468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052468

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Farid R, Mirfeizi Z, Mirheidari M, Rezaieyazdi Z, Mansouri H, Esmaelli H, et al. Pycnogenol supplementation reduces pain and stiffness and improves physical function in adults with knee osteoarthritis. Nutr Res. (2007) 27:692–7. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2007.09.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Cisar P, Jany R, Waczulikova I, Sumegova K, Muchova J, Vojtassak J, et al. Effect of pine bark extract (Pycnogenol) on symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Phytother Res. (2008) 22:1087–92. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2461

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] 42. Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Errichi S, Zulli C, Errichi BM, Vinciguerra G, et al. Treatment of osteoarthritis with Pycnogenol. The SVOS (St. Valentino Osteo-arthrosis Study). Evaluation of signs, symptoms, physical performance and vascular aspects. Phytother Res. (2008) 22:518–2 doi: 10.1002/ptr.2376

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Zhao H, Wu J, Wang N, Grether-Beck S, Krutmann J, Wei L. Oral Pycnogenol(R) intake benefits the skin in urban Chinese outdoor workers: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and crossover Intervention study. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. (2021) 56:1–11. doi: 10.1159/000514323

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Cai C, Zeng B, Lin L, Zheng M, Burki C, Grether-Beck S, et al. An oral French maritime pine bark extract improves hair density in menopausal women: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind intervention study. Health Sci Rep. (2023) 6:e1045. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Spadea L, Balestrazzi E. Treatment of vascular retinopathies with Pycnogenol. Phytother Res. (2001) 15:219–23. doi: 10.1002/ptr.853

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Steigerwalt R, Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Di Renzo A, Grossi MG, Ricci A, et al. Pycnogenol improves microcirculation, retinal edema, and visual acuity in early diabetic retinopathy. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. (2009) 25:537–40. doi: 10.1089/jop.2009.0023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kohama T, Negami M. Effect of low-dose French maritime pine bark extract on climacteric syndrome in 170 perimenopausal women. J Reprod Med. (2013) 58:39–46.

48. Suzuki N, Uebaba K, Kohama T, Ohno S, Moniwa N, Kanayama N, et al. French Maritime Pine Bark Extract significantly lowers requirement of analgesic medication in Dysmenorrhea - a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Reprod Med. (2008) 53:338–46.

49. Hosseini SPS, Sadrzadeh SMH, Farid F, Farid R, Watson RR. Pycnogenol in the management of asthma. J Med Food. (2001) 4:201–9. doi: 10.1089/10966200152744472

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Lau BH, Riesen SK, Truong KP, Lau EW, Rohdewald P, Barreta RA. Pycnogenol as an adjunct in the management of childhood asthma. J Asthma. (2004) 41:825–32. doi: 10.1081/JAS-200038433

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wilson D, Evans M, Guthrie N, Sharma P, Baisley J, Schonlau F, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study to evaluate the potential of Pycnogenol for improving allergic rhinitis symptoms. Phytother Res. (2010) 24:1115–9. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3232

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Watanabe K, Hiramine H, Hamada N. Effects of French pine bark extract chewing gum on oral Malodor and salivary bacteria. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. (2018) 64:185–91. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.64.185

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Pavlovic P. Improved Endurance By Use Of Antioxidants. Eur Bull Drug Res. (1999) 7:26–9.

54. Bentley DJ, Coupland R, Midgley A, Spence I. Acute antioxidant supplementation improves endurance performance in trained athletes. Res Sports Med. (2012) 20:1–12. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2011.608050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Ackerman J, Clifford T, McNaughton LR, Bentley DJ. The effect of an acute antioxidant supplementation compared with placebo on performance and hormonal response during a high volume resistance training session. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. (2014) 11:10. doi: 10.1186/1550-2783-11-10

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Mach JMA, Dank S, Grant RS, Bentley DJ. The effect of antioxidant supplementation on fatigue during exercise: Potential role for NAD+(H). Nutrients. (2010) 2:319–29. doi: 10.3390/nu2030319

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Drehsen G. From ancient pine bark uses to Pycnogenol. In: Packer L, Hiramatsu M, Yoshikawa T editors. Antioxidant food supplements in human health. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press (1999). p. 311–22. doi: 10.1016/B978-012543590-1/50021-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Şen G, Akbulut S, Karaköse M. Ethnopharmacological study of medicinal plants in Kastamonu province (Türkiye). Open Chem. (2022) 20:873–911. doi: 10.1515/chem-2022-0204

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Papp N, Purger D, Czigle S, Czégényi D, Stranczinger S, Tóth M, et al. The importance of pine species in the ethnomedicine of Transylvania (Romania). Plants. (2022) 11:2331. doi: 10.3390/plants11182331

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

[ Abstract ] 60. Rashid S, Ahmad M, Zafar M, Sultana S, Ayub M, Khan MA, et al. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinally important shrubs and trees of Himalayan region of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. J Ethnopharmacol. (2015) 166:340–5 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.03.042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Simpson T, Kure C, Stough C. Assessing the efficacy and mechanisms of Pycnogenol® on cognitive aging from in vitro animal and human studies. Front Pharmacol. (2019) 10:694. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00694

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Favero G, Paganelli C, Buffoli B, Rodella LF, Rezzani R. Endothelium and Its alterations in cardiovascular diseases: Life style intervention. BioMed Res Int. (2014) 2014:1–28. doi: 10.1155/2014/801896

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Konukoglu D, Uzun H. Endothelial dysfunction and hypertension. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2017) 956:511–40. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_90

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Schäfer A, Högger P. Oligomeric procyanidins of French maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol) effectively inhibit alpha-glucosidase. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2007) 77:41–6. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.10.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] 65. Castro-Ferreira R, Cardoso R, Leite-Moreira A, Mansilha A. The role of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in chronic venous disease. Ann Vasc Surg. (2018) 46:380–9 doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.131

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Felt BT, Biermann B, Christner JG, Kochhar P, Harrison RV. Diagnosis and management of ADHD in children. Am Fam Physician. (2014) 90:456–64.

67. Wenthur CJ. Classics in chemical neuroscience: Methylphenidate. ACS Chem Neurosci. (2016) 7:1030–40. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00199

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Floyd RA, Hensley K. Oxidative stress in brain aging. Implications for therapeutics of neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Aging. (2002) 23:795–807. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00019-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Raju RP, Terry AV. Dysregulation of cellular energetics in Gulf war illness. Toxicology. (2021) 461:152894. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152894

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. World Health Organization. Osteoarthritis. Geneva: World Health Organization (2023).

71. Jessberger S, Högger P, Genest F, Salter DM, Seefried L. Cellular pharmacodynamic effects of Pycnogenol(R) in patients with severe osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Complement Altern Med. (2017) 17:537. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-2044-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Mülek M, Seefried L, Genest F, Högger P. Distribution of constituents and metabolites of maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol((R))) into serum, blood cells, and synovial fluid of patients with severe osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. (2017) 9:443. doi: 10.3390/nu9050443

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Ayres EL, Silva JDS, Eberlin S, Facchini G, Vasconcellos C, Costa A. In-vitro effect of pine bark extract on melanin synthesis, tyrosinase activity, production of endothelin-1 and PPAR in cultured melanocytes exposed to ultraviolet, infrared, and visible light radiation. J Cosmet Dermatol. (2021) 21:1234–42. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. (2010) 376:124–36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62124-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Barcikowska Z, Rajkowska-Labon E, Grzybowska ME, Hansdorfer-Korzon R, Zorena K. Inflammatory Markers in Dysmenorrhea and Therapeutic Options. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:1191. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Gould GS, Hurst JR, Trofor A, Alison JA, Fox G, Kulkarni MM, et al. Recognising the importance of chronic lung disease: A consensus statement from the global alliance for chronic diseases (lung diseases group). Respir Res. (2023) 24:15. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02297-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Dharmage SC, Perret JL, Custovic A. Epidemiology of asthma in children and adults. Front Pediatr. (2019) 7:246. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00246

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Kuruvilla ME, Lee FE, Lee GB. Understanding asthma phenotypes, endotypes, and mechanisms of disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2019) 56:219–33. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8712-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Schoettler N, Strek ME. Recent advances in severe asthma: From phenotypes to personalized medicine. Chest. (2020) 157:516–28. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Torras MA, Faura CA, Schonlau F, Rohdewald P. Antimicrobial activity of Pycnogenol. Phytother Res. (2005) 19:647–8. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1662

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Kawamura T, Muraoka I. Exercise-induced oxidative stress and the effects of antioxidant intake from a physiological viewpoint. Antioxidants (Basel). (2018) 7:119. doi: 10.3390/antiox7090119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords : Pycnogenol®, pine bark extract, placebo-controlled, double-blind, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, endothelial health, cardiovascular

Citation: Weichmann F and Rohdewald P (2024) Pycnogenol® French maritime pine bark extract in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled human clinical studies. Front. Nutr. 11:1389374. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1389374

Received: 21 February 2024; Accepted: 22 April 2024; Published: 02 May 2024.

Copyright © 2024 Weichmann and Rohdewald. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Franziska Weichmann, ZnJhbnppc2thLndlaWNobWFubkBob3JwaGFnLmNvbQ==

pentaerythrityl tetraethylhexanoate Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.