Our monthly market analysis and positioning
Though on some days it certainly didn’t feel like it, the unbearably vacuous U.S. election campaign did not dominate all headlines in October. Developments in the Middle East also kept the world in suspense, investors awaited further details of the Chinese stimulus package, Japan's prime minister made a bad bet, Europe suffered some rather mixed economic figures and UK chancellor shocked investors with her inaugural budget. Meanwhile, in the markets, the quarterly reporting season began, providing investors with plenty of numbers to chew on. One thing at a time. Although the U.S. election campaign produced nothing meaningful, it still dictated the mood on the U.S. financial markets. The “Trump trade” was back as the former president regained significant ground in the polls. Furthermore, some economic data surprised on the upside. This caused U.S. interest rates to rise, the dollar to strengthen and, for some reason, outperformance by U.S. stock markets of those in the rest of the world. As our CIO for the Americas speculated: “The last few days price in the best of all worlds. After the election, the hard decisions await.” half cut solar panel
China’s stimuli packages failed to meet expectations - maybe one of the reasons for the weak oil price
In China those in power would love investors to price in the best of all possible worlds. The initial euphoria over the stimulus package announced at the end of September evaporated during the course of the month, as little of substance followed. Another blow was industry profits, weaker than at any time since the Covid slump of 2020. In Japan, Shigeru Ishiba, the newly elected leader of the ruling Liberal democratic (LDP) party miscalculated by calling for snap elections in which his party lost its parliamentary majority for the first time since 2009. The fact that the stock markets performed relatively well despite the political uncertainty can probably only be explained by the simultaneous weakening of the yen, which favors Japanese exports. In Europe, economic data was mixed. The once proud core countries performed rather weakly, while Europe's periphery, led by Spain, did much better.
Finally, there is the region that currently has bigger concerns than economic growth, the Middle East. Here, the conflict threatened to escalate, particularly between Israel and Iran. When fears eased a little, the oil market quickly calmed down again and the price of Brent fell almost to USD 70/barrel at the end of the month, about the same as its low point in the past year.
A weak final trading day in October caused almost all global equity and bond markets to slip into negative territory for the month. Only Japan remained in the green. Emerging markets took the biggest hit, down 4.3%. For the S&P 500, it was the first negative month in six months. For global bonds, it was the worst month since September 2022 – with 10-year Treasuries losing almost 4%. Euro high-yield bonds were one of the few segments to achieve a positive return.
Two curiosities and a déjà-vu in the UK
Two curiosities in other markets were more interesting. The first relates to the weak oil price. While inflation expectations, and thus ultimately interest rates, are usually closely aligned with the oil price, both data series rose again in the month despite weak commodity prices – which in turn can probably only be explained by the “Trump trade,” which reflects a certain degree of concern about rising inflation rates. The price of gold is the basis for the second curiosity. It continued to rise unabated to new record highs, even though the dollar index rose by almost 4% and even though U.S. real interest rates (10year) rose by almost half a percentage point. That certainly is the dark side of the Trump trade: the fear of debt-induced currency devaluation. On an annualized basis, gold and silver are now up by 33 and 35%, respectively. Also worth mentioning was the jump in yields on British government bonds. 10-years rose to 4.45% after the budget, with its ample new borrowing, had some minor echoes of Liz Truss's catastrophic mini-budget two years ago. Other than during the brief Truss panic, British 10-year yields traded at the end of October at their highest premium (over 200 basis pointsover German government bonds since the early 1990s.
Regardless of how the U.S. elections ultimately turn out and it could take days, if not weeks, before the exact result and repercussions for the Congress are known -- nothing could be more difficult than predicting the immediate market reaction after the first projections of the result. The 2020 election was very close and then, as now, the market mostly assumed that a Trump victory would boost the stock market more. Biden won, and yet the S&P 500 initially rose. In addition, no one knows what probability of victory the market has really priced in. Finally, the details of the election result, in terms of seats and political control -- in other words, whether a candidate can govern with his party or not – will determine to what degree anything significant will change for the economy and the markets.
After the better-than-expected economic data in the U.S., coupled with a slight uptick in inflation, market expectations regarding Fed interest rate cuts have clearly moved towards fewer cuts, which had been our expectation. In the space of six weeks three interest rate moves by mid-2025 have been priced out of the consensus view. In the run-up to the U.S. election, however, there is another influence on bond yields, especially at the long end of the yield curve: concern about the U.S. debt mountain and the budget deficit. The recent rise in yields in the UK has also shown that bond investors are concerned about the size and growth in government debt.
We made a few tactical changes in October because some yield developments seemed exaggerated to us, especially in the U.S. We believe that 2-year Treasury yields do not sufficiently reflect the Fed's plans to cut interest rates and have set our signal to +1, i.e. buy. At the beginning of November, we also took this step on 10-year debt.
We remain strategically positive on corporate bonds, as the economic environment and the major central banks' intended path of interest rate cuts remain positive for this investment segment. But risk premiums have already narrowed so much against government bond yields that we see little room for maneuver. We have therefore downgraded investment-grade European corporate bonds to neutral from a tactical perspective.
For similar reasons we have also downgraded emerging market government bonds, albeit from neutral to minus 1. In addition to the narrow risk premiums, there is the more immediate risk from the U.S. election, which could weigh on emerging market economies in a variety of ways, such as trade sanctions and dollar strength.
The currency market could be one of the asset classes most affected by the U.S. election. This is where possible punitive import tariffs and other trade sanctions, as well as the size of the future increase in the U.S. debt mountain, come into play. For now, we expect the dollar to appreciate further on the back of the better-than-expected performance of the U.S. economy.
Once we have finally put the U.S. election behind us, equity investors will be able to focus again on what they prefer: an economy that is performing well -- or the prospect of more generous central banks because it is not. The quarterly figures do not show a clear trend; rather, there are strong differences between sectors, but also within sectors. On the surface, only the Chinese market looks favorable in terms of valuations at present, but in our view those low valuations are warranted, as shareholder interests don’t seem to be the priority of companies and the government. However, before we get to the regions (in which we have made no tactical changes), we want to talk about a tactical change in sectors: We have upgraded the utilities sector to overweight, driven primarily by the U.S. market, where rapidly expanding AI infrastructure is driving up demand for electricity.
The U.S. remains the most expensively valued stock market, thanks in part to tech stocks, which continue to benefit from AI speculation as well as actual AI investments. We expect a period of disillusionment after the U.S. election, during which investors may have to downgrade some of the hopes they had pinned on the election.
Europe’s valuation discount to the U.S., as measured by the price-earnings ratio, remains at a record level. While this does not help on timing any market entry, it is one reason why Europe remains our only overweight region. Europe's economy is continuing to recover, albeit in small steps and at different speeds.
German companies have achieved mixed results in the current reporting season. 2025 earnings expectations have recently been revised down, which has not been the case in the rest of Europe. This has not prevented the market from outperforming the Stoxx 600 over the past three months, but we will only believe in a sustainable recovery when the global goods industry really gets back on its feet.
Japanese companies continue to struggle with a sharply fluctuating currency, which is also unwelcome for stock investors. Together with the weak global market for manufactured goods, this currently prevents us from raising the market to overweight, even though we like it very much from a structural point of view.
Alternative investments are also being strongly influenced by the U.S. election, as well as by the question of how sustainable the recent rise in yields on government bonds on both sides of the Atlantic will prove to be. In October, for example, real 10-year U.S. yields rose by almost half a percentage point, which in theory should be bad news for alternative investments. But so far precious metals have reacted surprisingly little.
Over the coming months and years, the 2024 presidential election is likely to affect U.S. real estate in three main areas: economic growth, changes in inflation, and tax policies on property types and regions. Rent controls or home-buying incentives from a Harris administration could be a headwind. Easing of building regulations by a Trump administration could be a tailwind for the sector, although one that could be partially offset by stricter immigration policy. Any overall impacts from the election on the apartment sector are likely to be small.
We believe the imminent U.S. presidential election could potentially create uncertainty and have a long-lasting impact on infrastructure investors and citizens. Stable, “pure-play” infrastructure companies that own physical economic assets may prove to be winners over the long term.
We expect the gold price to gradually climb from here. Some of the risk premium will be priced out of the gold market post U.S. election but policy risk thereafter could replace it, maintaining the interest in investing in gold.
We are not surprised to see silver performing well given a number of supportive factors, including increasing global money supply, accelerating inflation, and rising gold prices. Other bullish fundamentals include its industrial uses, such as for solar panel manufacturing, and a multi-year structural supply deficit. According to the Silver Institute, 2024 will be the fourth consecutive year of supply-demand deficit, with the deficit widening in 2024, and the sixth consecutive year with the market balance in deficit when investment from exchange-traded products (ETPs) is included. We expect these deficits could last into 2025 and beyond and would not be surprised to see silver make a run towards an all-time high in the not-too-distant future.
Just when one thought that supply side concerns were moderating and attention turning once again to demand for crude, it has become evident that the oil market will have to deal with geopolitical risks more than it wants to. Our main scenario, that weakness in demand growth into year-end will keep the oil price contained for the time being, has been tested again recently as OPEC+ decided at the beginning of November to postpone its production increase planned for December by one month. It’s also not yet clear, after the U.S. warning to Iran on November 3rd not to attack Israel again, whether Israel-Iran tensions have peaked.
Past performance is not indicative of future returns.
Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P., DWS Investment GmbH as of 10/30/24
The focus of our tactical view for fixed income is on trends in bond prices. Positive view Neutral view Negative view
Positive return potential for long-only investors Limited return opportunity as well as downside risk Negative return potential for long-only investors
2. Relative to the MSCI AC World Index
10. MSCI AC Asia ex Japan Index
12. MSCI AC World Consumer Stables Index
13. MSCI AC World Health Care Index
14. MSCI AC World Communication Services Index
15. MSCI AC World Utilities Index
16. MSCI AC World Consumer Discretionary Index
17. MSCI AC World Energy Index
18. MSCI AC World Financials Index
19. MSCI AC World Industrials Index
20. MSCI AC World Information Technology Index
21. MSCI AC World Materials Index
22. Russel 2000 Index relative to the S&P 500
23. Stoxx Europe Small 200 relative to the Stoxx Europe 600
24. Relative to the MSCI AC World Index
550w solar panel 25. Relative to the Bloomberg Commodity Index