Blog

A peptide-centric local stability assay enables proteome-scale identification of the protein targets and binding regions of diverse ligands | Nature Methods

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Nature Methods (2024 )Cite this article aapptec peptide synthesizer

By using a limited-proteolysis strategy that employs a large amount of trypsin to generate peptides directly from native proteins, we found that ligand-induced protein local stability shifts can be sensitively detected on a proteome-wide scale. This enabled us to develop the peptide-centric local stability assay, a modification-free approach that achieves unprecedented sensitivity in proteome-wide target identification and binding-region determination. We demonstrate the broad applications of the peptide-centric local stability assay by investigating interactions across various biological contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

Receive 12 print issues and online access

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

The raw mass spectrometry proteomics data, protein identification and quantification results have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD034606. The source data associated with Supplementary Figs. 1–21 are available via Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26886625 (ref. 28). The source data include all primary datasets and referenced datasets. The Supplementary Tables referenced in the Supplementary Notes are published alongside this paper. A step-by-step PELSA protocol has been deposited via protocols.io with the link https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.q26g717x1gwz/v2 (ref. 29). Protein structures are download from PDB (https://www.rcsb.org/) with accession codes: 1FAP (FKBP1A-mTOR), 1U72 (DHFR), 5EHR (PTPN11), 2D8Y (LIMA1), 2PSN (ENO1), 4DMB (HDDC2), AF-Q9H2U2-F1-mod (PPA2), 1WAO (PPP5C), 5LN3 (human 26S Proteasome), 1BOZ and 4EJ1 (DHFR-folate), 1P4R (ATIC), 1RBY (GART) and 6KQY (LARS1). The reviewed human fasta database was downloaded from UniProt in June 2018 (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb). Source data are provided with this paper.

The code of PELSA data processing pipeline is available via GitHub at https://github.com/DICP-1809/PELSA-Decipher.

Kaur, U. et al. Proteome-wide structural biology: an emerging field for the structural analysis of proteins on the proteomic scale. J. Proteome Res. 17, 3614–3627 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lyu, J., Wang, K. & Ye, M. Modification-free approaches to screen drug targets at proteome level. Trends Anal. Chem. 124, 115574 (2020).

Martinez Molina, D. et al. Monitoring drug target engagement in cells and tissues using the cellular thermal shift assay. Science 341, 84–87 (2013).

Savitski, M. M. et al. Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome. Science 346, 55 (2014).

Lomenick, B. et al. Target identification using drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21984–21989 (2009).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schopper, S. et al. Measuring protein structural changes on a proteome-wide scale using limited proteolysis-coupled mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 12, 2391–2410 (2017).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Piazza, I. et al. A map of protein-metabolite interactions reveals principles of chemical communication. Cell 172, 358–372.e323 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feng, Y. H. et al. Global analysis of protein structural changes in complex proteomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1036–1044 (2014).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Piazza, I. et al. A machine learning-based chemoproteomic approach to identify drug targets and binding sites in complex proteomes. Nat. Commun. 11, 4200 (2020).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tian, Y. et al. Chemoproteomic mapping of the glycolytic targetome in cancer cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1480–1491 (2023).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ruan, C. et al. Proteome-wide deconvolution of drug targets and binding sites by lysine reactivity profiling. Anal. Chem. 94, 3352–3359 (2022).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tan, S. & Richmond, T. J. DNA binding-induced conformational change of the yeast transcriptional activator PRTF. Cell 62, 367–377 (1990).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fontana, A. et al. Probing protein structure by limited proteolysis. Acta Biochim. Pol. 51, 299–321 (2004).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scaltriti, M. et al. Lapatinib, a HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, induces stabilization and accumulation of HER2 and potentiates trastuzumab-dependent cell cytotoxicity. Oncogene 28, 803–814 (2009).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li, J., Kim, S. G. & Blenis, J. Rapamycin: one drug, many effects. Cell Metab. 19, 373–379 (2014).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

März, A. M., Fabian, A.-K., Kozany, C., Bracher, A. & Hausch, F. Large FK506-binding proteins shape the pharmacology of rapamycin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 1357–1367 (2013).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ball, K. A. et al. An isothermal shift assay for proteome scale drug-target identification. Commun. Biol. 3, 75 (2020).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zinn, N. et al. Improved proteomics-based drug mechanism-of-action studies using 16-plex isobaric mass tags. J. Proteome Res. 20, 1792–1801 (2021).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ruan, C. et al. Matrix thermal shift assay for fast construction of multidimensional ligand–target space. Anal. Chem. 94, 6482–6490 (2022).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nam, N. H. et al. Design of tetrapeptide ligands as inhibitors of the Src SH2 domain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12, 779–787 (2004).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wisniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359–362 (2009).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liao, R., Gao, Y., Chen, M., Li, L. & Hu, X. A ubiquitous but overlooked side reaction in dimethyl labeling of peptides. Anal. Chem. 90, 13533–13540 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tyanova, S., Temu, T. & Cox, J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 11, 2301–2319 (2016).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Losman, J. A., Koivunen, P. & Kaelin, W. G. Jr. 2-Oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 710–726 (2020).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Waldron, T. T. & Murphy, K. P. Stabilization of proteins by ligand binding: application to drug screening and determination of unfolding energetics. Biochemistry 42, 5058–5064 (2003).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimmperman, P. et al. A quantitative model of thermal stabilization and destabilization of proteins by ligands. Biophys. J. 95, 3222–3231 (2008).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Blum, M. et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D344–D354 (2021).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li, K. Source data for PELSA SI figures. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26886625 (2024).

Li, K. & Ye, M. PELSA protocol v.2. Protocols.io https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.q26g717x1gwz/v2 (2024).

We thank M. Savitski from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory for the fruitful discussion, for revising this manuscript and the point-by-point replies during the revision process. This work was supported, in part, by funds from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2021YFA1302601 to M.Y.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 92153302, 22437007 to M.Y., 22137002 to K.W., 92253303 to C.L., 22204033 to Y.L.), Dalian Science and Technology Innovation Fund (grant no. 2023JJ11CG006 to M.Y.), the innovation program of science and research from the DICP, CAS (grant nos. DICP I202109, DICP I202139 to M.Y.), the project of National Multidisciplinary Innovation Team of Traditional Chinese Medicine from National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (grant no. ZYYCXTD-202004 to C.L.), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (grant no. 2022279 to S.C.).

Present address: Genome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany

Present address: Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics, CAS Key Laboratory of Separation Sciences for Analytical Chemistry, National Chromatographic R&A Center, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Dalian, China

Kejia Li, Keyun Wang, Yan Wang, Lianji Xue, Yuying Ye, Zheng Fang, Jiawen Lyu, Haiyang Zhu, Yanan Li, Ting Yu, Xiaolei Zhang, Chengfei Ruan, Jiahua Zhou, Qi Wang & Mingliang Ye

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Kejia Li, Lianji Xue, Yuying Ye, Zheng Fang, Jiawen Lyu, Haiyang Zhu, Ting Yu, Chengfei Ruan, Jiahua Zhou, Qi Wang & Mingliang Ye

Drug Discovery and Design Center, the Center for Chemical Biology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

Shijie Chen, Feng Yang, Siqi Guo & Cheng Luo

MOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

School of Pharmacy, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

M.Y., K.L. and K.W. conceived and designed the project. K.L. developed the method, carried out the experiments and analyzed the results under the supervision of M.Y. S.C., F.Y. and S.G. measured the binding affinities of purified HSP90AA1 to HSP90 inhibitors and validated the off-targets identified for HSP90 inhibitors and R2HG under the supervision of C.L. K.W. advised on the experimental design. Y.W. set up the MS analysis methods, discussed the experiment results and edited the manuscript. L.X. performed the dose-dependent rapamycin/geldanamycin/tanespimycin/ganetespib PELSA experiments and tested different enzyme quantities. Y.Y. performed the fumarate-PELSA, succinate-PELSA, folate-TPP and leucine-TPP experiments. Z.F. gave help with data processing. J.L. helped in the experiment investigating PTM’s readers. H.Z. helped in data processing in the Zn2+ experiment. Y.L. helped to correct the manuscript. T.Y. advised on investigating the leucine-binding proteins. J.Z. helped in calculating the Euclidean distances between peptides and ligands. X.Z., C.R. and Q.W. gave scientific advice. M.D. discussed the results and revised the manuscript. K.L. and M.Y. wrote the paper with input from other authors.

Correspondence to Cheng Luo or Mingliang Ye.

A patent application related to this work has been filed by Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China.

Nature Methods thanks Marcus Bantscheff and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Allison Doerr, in collaboration with the Nature Methods team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

a, Local stability profiles of FKBP family proteins under 2 µM rapamycin treatment. Only peptides from FKBP domains display altered abundance. b, Dose-response curves of FKBP1A peptides (left) and FKBP1A protein (right) measured by PELSA in HeLa cell lysates toward rapamycin. The protein-level dose-response curve is generated by fitting the averaged fold change values of all qualified peptides across each rapamycin concentration. c, Binding affinities between rapamycin and FKBP1A peptides measured by LiP-Quant. DRC refers to the Pearson correlation coefficient of the dose-response curve; LiP-Quant score indicates the likelihood of being a genuine drug-binding protein. Data are extracted from the literature9. d, Protein-level dose-response curves of FKBP family proteins measured by PELSA.

a, Overlap analysis of staurosporine targets identified by PELSA in HeLa and K562 cell lysates. Kinases are considered true positive targets, while the non-kinase targets are listed based on their identification in HeLa and K562 cell lysates. b, Comparing the number of staurosporine targets determined in PELSA and thermal shift-based studies in K562 cell lysates. The percentage of kinase targets among all the determined staurosporine targets (that is, true positive rate, TPR) is indicated for each study.

Supplementary Tables 1–8 related to the Supplementary Notes.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Li, K., Chen, S., Wang, K. et al. A peptide-centric local stability assay enables proteome-scale identification of the protein targets and binding regions of diverse ligands. Nat Methods (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02553-7

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02553-7

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Nature Methods (Nat Methods) ISSN 1548-7105 (online) ISSN 1548-7091 (print)

peptide conference 2024 Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.