HORIZONTV FEATURING BD+C: WATCH EPISODES ON DEMAND AT HORIZONTV
Experts from Simpson Gumpertz & Heger explore this sheet pile “water management wall” approach. flooring installation
Experts from Simpson Gumpertz & Heger explore this sheet pile “water management wall” approach.
Steel sheet piles have more than a century-long history of being used to support excavations for buried structures (Figure 1). During the construction process, the sheet piles traditionally provide earth retention and, in conjunction with a dewatering system, control of subsurface water into the construction site (both for leakage through the sheet pile system and for seepage below the sheet pile system).
In contemporary building development projects and in the context of subsurface water control, the role of the sheet pile system is typically temporary, until a dedicated waterproofing layer is applied to the building’s foundation wall.
However, for projects that do not include moisture-sensitive below-grade spaces, project teams sometimes elect to forego foundation wall waterproofing and rely instead on sheet piles alone for semi-permanent or permanent reduction of subsurface water. One example project application is a wall demarcating adjacent portions of a multi-phased below-grade garage (where subsequent phases of the below-grade structure will be constructed several years after the initial phase).
To implement this sheet pile “water management wall” approach successfully, multidisciplinary teams must closely coordinate to set appropriate expectations, assign and execute design and construction roles, and incorporate technical considerations that are not otherwise a focus of traditional sheet pile support of excavation (SOE) design. In this article, we explore aspects of sheet pile subsurface water control systems for buildings organized by the project’s primary stakeholders and considerations within their purview.
It is vital that the Owner/Developer’s project team be informed with reasonable expectations of what will be required from their capital program during the service life of a building’s below-grade water management system. Fundamentally, this includes the knowledge that the success of the sheet pile water management wall’s long-term performance will rely on maintenance activities. In developing a program to manage periodic water infiltration (leakage) in service, the Owner/Developer should understand that such a program will likely include the following:
As part of their role in developing the project’s overall design documentation, the Architect prepares construction drawings and specifications and coordinates with subconsultants who prepare specific aspects of the design. The sheet pile water management wall is inherently multidisciplinary, but the architectural details can help synthesize the basis-of-design for the architectural, structural, and plumbing features of the design.
If other foundation elevations or the underside of the slab is covered in waterproofing, the Architect (and their design consulting team, e.g., a Building Enclosure consultant) should consider and establish details for the integration between the sheet pile water management wall and the below-grade waterproofing system.
If the Architect decides to incorporate an interior partition to conceal the sheet pile wall, the design should account for the Owner’s building management personnel's continuing need to periodically access the interior face of the sheet piles to perform the maintenance activities described previously. If interior programming would not allow the partition to be offset from the wall by a substantial distance, the design should seek to avoid scenarios where a partition that is closely offset from the sheet piles unnecessarily commits the Owner to costly and logistically challenging Confined Space operations or total partition demolition upon the need to access the sheet pile wall face.
One appropriate design strategy would be to use partition systems that can be readily removed/reinstalled by the Owner’s maintenance personnel. Other design decisions that can be reflected on the architectural details include raising the bottom of the partition on a concrete curb to create a “gutter” to collect and divert leakage water to internal drains at the bottom of the sheet pile wall. The collected leakage water would be directed to sump basins that pump the water from the below-grade spaces.
The Structural Engineer of Record (SEOR), in addition to their role related to the below-grade building design, conventionally develops the structural basis-of-design for the SOE system, using site-specific conditions and parameters provided by the Geotechnical Engineer. Sheet pile design is often specified as a Delegated Design scope of work, i.e., with the final design completed by an engineer retained by the construction team. From the standpoint of designing for the sheet pile wall’s water leakage control function, the SEOR should consider:
The Geotechnical Engineer evaluates the existing subsurface and groundwater conditions at the site. Using this information (e.g., groundwater table elevations and anticipated fluctuations, soil type and stratigraphy, soil permeability, etc.), they can identify feasible SOE system types for consideration by the project team. If sheet piles are to be used as a semi-permanent or permanent water management wall, the Geotechnical Engineer can select reasonable leakage criteria for the sheet piles, which is an important parameter associated with the water management wall strategy.
Leakage criteria can be informed by available industry references. For example, the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC) publishes the Soil Mechanics Design Manual 7.01 which contains information related to seepage criteria, including the following excerpt: “In pervious sand and gravel… the quantity of water passing through intact interlocks may be as much as 0.1 gpm per foot of wall length for each 10 ft differential in head across sheeting, unless special measures are taken to seal interlocks.” The determination of leakage criteria should also be inclusive of specific attributes of the basis-of-design of the sheet pile wall (e.g., penetrations from soil tie-back anchors).
Moreover, the Geotechnical Engineer should identify the risks, if applicable for the project region and soil and groundwater conditions, of mineral formation (e.g., iron ochre) on the sheet pile design strategy. The Geotechnical Engineer typically also evaluates the need for the sheet piles to serve a cutoff function to control seepage.
Some below grade structures in regions such as Washington, DC, have experienced failures of sub-grade drainage systems as a result of iron ochre. Iron ochre can decrease the ability of a drainage system (such as a sheet pile leakage collection system) to function by clogging drain openings and pipes (Figure 3). Such clogging can be detrimental to the Owner’s maintenance program associated with the drains. Accordingly, in areas with known issues with iron ochre or drainage performance problems, a study of soil/groundwater chemistry should be performed to inform on the risk of iron ochre and other contaminants.
The Environmental Engineer provides recommendations for treating groundwater for contaminants, if applicable.
As part of planning to implement the construction of the below-grade building structure, the General Contractor often influences the selection of the SOE system based on factors including property line considerations, construction logistics, schedule, cost, sequence of building construction, and input from their SOE Trade Contractor. The General Contractor also typically controls the project’s temporary dewatering program, which must be coordinated with the sequencing of bringing the sheet pile water management wall (and its leakage collection drainage system) into service at the appropriate time.
Using the project design team, their experience, and information from the Sheet Pile Manufacturer and SOE delegated-design engineer retained by the construction team, the SOE Trade Contractor completes the final design of the selected SOE system and then executes its construction. Prior to project bidding, the SOE Trade Contractor should review and confirm the feasibility of the leakage and seepage basis-of-design established by the design team, including obtaining input from the Sheet Pile Manufacturer. The SOE Trade Contractor and Sheet Pile Manufacturer may consider the following as they plan how they will deliver the sheet pile water management wall to meet the project’s criteria:
While the above methods can help the sheet pile water management wall meet the project's leakage criteria, the ability to implement them can be impacted by sequence of the overall project's construction activities (i.e., top-down versus bottom-up construction sequencing, which is not discussed in detail in this article). With that said, the project team should review if/how construction sequencing affects the leakage mitigating strategies selected for the sheet pile wall.
After the project’s permissible leakage rate is established, the Plumbing Engineer designs the internal drainage systems to collect and divert sheet pile leakage to sump basins during the service life of the building. This includes designing the appropriate drainage system layout, drain types and quantity with consideration to project-specific aspects of the sheet pile wall (e.g., locating drains directly below vulnerabilities such as at end conditions of the sheet pile wall where it meets adjacent below-grade structures).
Steel sheet piles can serve as part of a semi-permanent or permanent water management strategy for below-grade spaces where long-term management of leakage is not contrary to the function of the interior space. The successful execution of this strategy is dependent on realistic and well-communicated expectations, an integrated mindset and coordinated effort between a variety of project design, construction, and ownership entities.
The days of uninspired dorm rooms with little more than a bed and a communal bathroom down the hall are long gone. Students increasingly seek inclusive design, communities to enhance learning and living, and a focus on wellness that encompasses everything from meditation spaces to mental health resources.
In Greenwich, Conn., the Bruce Museum, a multidisciplinary institution highlighting art, science, and history, has undergone a campus revitalization and expansion that more than doubles the museum’s size. Designed by EskewDumezRipple and built by Turner Construction, the project includes a 42,000-sf, three-floor addition as well as a comprehensive renovation of the 32,500-sf museum, which was originally built as a private home in the mid-19th century and expanded in the early 1990s.
A promising research project looks at the possibilities for thermoelectric systems to thermally condition buildings, writes Mahsa Farid Mohajer, Sustainable Building Analyst with Stantec.
The University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine has opened the 94,576-sf, five-floor Education Building II (EDII). Created by the design-build team of CO Architects and Hensel Phelps, the medical school’s new home supports team-based student learning, offers social spaces, and provides departmental offices for faculty and staff.
The Cowichan District Hospital Replacement Project in Duncan, British Columbia, features an expansive community hall featuring mass timber construction. The hall, designed to promote social interaction and connection to give patients, families, and staff a warm and welcoming environment, connects a Diagnostic and Treatment (“D&T”) Block and Inpatient Tower.
Researchers at MIT have developed a concrete mixture that can store electrical energy. The researchers say the mixture of water, cement, and carbon black could be used for building foundations and street paving.
The U.S. Department of Energy has released a new national definition of a zero emissions building. The definition is intended to provide industry guidance to support new and existing commercial and residential buildings to move towards zero emissions across the entire building sector, DOE says.
About a year ago our industry was abuzz with an idea that seemed like a one-shot miracle cure for both the shockingly high rate of office vacancies and the worsening housing shortage. The seemingly simple idea of converting empty office buildings to multifamily residential seemed like an easy and elegant solution. However, in the intervening months we’ve seen only a handful of these conversions, despite near universal enthusiasm for the concept.
BD+C evaluated more than a dozen of the nation's most prominent hospital construction projects to identify trends that are driving hospital design and construction in the $67 billion healthcare sector. Here’s what we found.
In Brooklyn, New York, the recently opened Atrium at Sumner offers 132,418 sf of affordable housing for seniors. The $132 million project includes 190 apartments—132 of them available to senior households earning below or at 50% of the area median income and 57 units available to formerly homeless seniors.
The days of uninspired dorm rooms with little more than a bed and a communal bathroom down the hall are long gone. Students increasingly seek inclusive design, communities to enhance learning and living, and a focus on wellness that encompasses everything from meditation spaces to mental health resources.
In Greenwich, Conn., the Bruce Museum, a multidisciplinary institution highlighting art, science, and history, has undergone a campus revitalization and expansion that more than doubles the museum’s size. Designed by EskewDumezRipple and built by Turner Construction, the project includes a 42,000-sf, three-floor addition as well as a comprehensive renovation of the 32,500-sf museum, which was originally built as a private home in the mid-19th century and expanded in the early 1990s.
A promising research project looks at the possibilities for thermoelectric systems to thermally condition buildings, writes Mahsa Farid Mohajer, Sustainable Building Analyst with Stantec.
The University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine has opened the 94,576-sf, five-floor Education Building II (EDII). Created by the design-build team of CO Architects and Hensel Phelps, the medical school’s new home supports team-based student learning, offers social spaces, and provides departmental offices for faculty and staff.
© 2023 copyright Building Design+Construction. All rights reserved.
pvc wall boards for bathrooms Each day, our editors assemble the latest breaking industry news, hottest trends, and most relevant research, delivered to your inbox.