Blog

DOL’s Final Independent Contractor Rule Returns to Six-Factor Test - HR Daily Advisor

Practical HR Tips, News & Advice. Updated Daily.

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has published its final rule on the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors (ICs). Under the rule, the DOL returns to the “totality of the circumstances test,” with a focus on workers’ economic dependency on their employers. Why Properly Determining Worker Status Is Important Portable External Media

DOL’s Final Independent Contractor Rule Returns to Six-Factor Test - HR Daily Advisor

Whether a worker is considered an employee or an IC is a legal distinction with significant employment ramifications. Employers don’t contribute to workers’ compensation or unemployment insurance for, withhold taxes from, provide benefits to, or comply with federal and state overtime and minimum wage requirements for ICs.

In short, many of the laws designed to protect employees from unfair or even bad acts by employers—such as minimum wage and overtime laws or discrimination in the workplace—don’t apply to ICs.

Yet ICs are an integral part of the nation’s workforce and perform work employers typically wouldn’t ask or expect their employees to do. For example, a retail store wouldn’t expect its employees to resurface its parking lot.

Getting the distinction right is important. Employers that improperly classify employees as ICs can be liable for back payments of workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance and penalized by both the DOL and state agencies. Final Rule Emphasizes Totality of Circumstances

The DOL’s final rule is intended to assist employers in determining when an employee is misclassified as an IC under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which governs labor conditions and worker well-being at the federal level. The rule doesn’t include a definition for ICs but rather defines who’s an employee and assumes workers who don’t meet the definition of employee may be properly classified as ICs.

At the core of the determination is economic dependency—that is, the economic reality test: Is the worker economically dependent on the employer for work or in business for themselves and therefore an IC? Some of the factors considered in the test include the opportunity for profit or loss, investment, permanency, control, whether the work is an integral part of the employer’s business, and skill and initiative. Six-Factor Test

The new rule uses six factors to assess the economic realities of the working relationship and the question of economic dependence. Although no single factor or subset of factors is necessarily dispositive, the weight given to each factor may change depending on the facts and circumstances of the particular relationship.

No. 1: Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill. Elements to be considered under this test include: Whether the worker determines or can meaningfully negotiate the charge or pay for the work provided; Whether the worker accepts or declines jobs or chooses the order and/or time in which the jobs are performed; Whether the worker engages in marketing, advertising, or other efforts to expand their business or secure more work; and Whether the worker makes decisions to hire others, purchase materials and equipment, and/or rent space.

If a worker has no opportunity for a profit or loss, then this factor suggests the worker is an employee.

No. 2: Investments by the worker and the potential employer. According to the rule, “investments that are capital or entrepreneurial in nature and thus indicate independent contractor status generally support an independent business and serve a business-like function, such as increasing the worker’s ability to do different types of or more work, reducing costs, or extending market reach.”

No. 3: Degree of permanence of the work relationship. A worker may be an IC when the work relationship is definite in duration, nonexclusive, project-based, or sporadic based on the worker being in business for themselves and marketing their services or labor to multiple entities.

No. 4: Nature and degree of control. This prong of the test considers a wide range of factors, including whether the potential employer sets workers’ schedule, supervises the performance of the work, explicitly limits workers’ ability to work for others, uses technological means to supervise the performance of the work, reserves the right to supervise or discipline workers, or places demands or restrictions on workers that don’t allow them to work for others or work when they choose.

No. 5: Extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the potential employer’s business. This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an employee when the work they perform is critical, necessary, or central to the potential employer’s principal business. For example, paving a retail store’s parking lot wouldn’t be considered an integral part of the employer’s business.

No. 6: Skill and initiative. This prong of the test examines whether the worker brings specialized skills to the workplace as opposed to being trained by the potential employer. If the worker’s use of specialized skills is connected to business-like initiative, that could indicate the worker is an IC.

The rule also allows for the consideration of additional factors if the factors in some way indicate whether the worker is in business for themselves as opposed to being economically dependent on the potential employer for work. Bottom Line

Determining whether a worker is properly classified as either an employee or an IC has significant legal consequences under federal and state law. The new rule is intended to guide you in making the correct determination, but you’re wise to consult with legal counsel before committing to a particular treatment.

Dave McCormack is a partner with Axley Brynelson, LLP, in Waukesha, Wisconsin. He can be reached at dmccormack@axley.com.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Have you ever been caught off guard by a resignation? If so, you’ve probably asked yourself why, too. On the surface, things seemed fine. The soon-to-be-former employee was a top performer who rarely — if ever — voiced concerns. In this guide, we’ll first examine turnover and retention by digging into the top reasons employees […]

Conflict resolution in the workplace can be broken down into steps to simplify the process. By doing so, HR and managers can ensure more effective communication and a more effective conflict resolution process.

Are you prepared to file your EEO-1 report, complete with the employee survey information broken down by EEO job category? The deadline to submit and certify 2019 and 2020 EEO-1 Component 1 data is Monday, August 23, 2021. After delaying the opening of the 2019 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection because of the COVID-19 public health […]

About 10% of Americans have experienced drug addiction at some point in their lives. If one of your employees is struggling with this disease, you might be tempted to fire him or her.

After the mass rollout of COVID-19 vaccines during spring 2021, Americans were looking forward to the end of the pandemic as millions were vaccinated. The optimists included not only individuals but also companies eager to get staff back into offices after more than a year of working remotely. While the highly publicized Delta variant has […]

The work and hiring landscape is rapidly changing. Are you keeping up? With the help of our sponsors, we created this brand new eBook to help you pave the way through your recruiting & talent acquisition path in 2024. We’ll discuss: How to manage a high-volume recruiting campaign Leading talent acquisition trends for 2024 How […]

In our “HR Task Automation and Employee Self-Service” survey conducted in mid-2023, we collected responses from 831 HR professionals about the significant role of technology in their industry. The findings highlight that certain HR tech tools assist teams in transitioning to more automated work processes while enabling employees to have more autonomy in their employment […]

Whether at work or home, today’s technology is ready to simplify our experience. Consider the smartphone: Talking and texting represent the bare minimum of what it allows us to do. Combined, Google Play and Apple’s App Store host nearly 6 million apps to help us accomplish everything from learning a new language to reminding us […]

DOL’s Final Independent Contractor Rule Returns to Six-Factor Test - HR Daily Advisor

Portable External Media When it comes to HR and workplace compliance trends, good things don’t happen to those who wait. HR pros have to take a proactive step forward to help their organizations succeed in 2024 and beyond. But with so many concepts and a wave of new employment laws, building your strategy can seem daunting. Luckily, you […]