Blog

5 Of The Highest Displacement 4-Cylinder Cars Ever Made | Feature | CarThrottle

If you talk about large capacity car engines, the mind automatically jumps to noisy V8s, ludicrous V12s and beyond. But how many people would think of big four-cylinder units?

Usually bred for compact dimensions and fuel efficiency, the humble four-pot is commonly specified at 2.0 litres and below. It’s pretty rare to find four-cylinder units above 2.5 litres in size, because the engineering needed to contain the vibrations above that size becomes excessive – not to mention the power benefits of having more cylinders over larger displacement. Diving Cylinder

5 Of The Highest Displacement 4-Cylinder Cars Ever Made | Feature | CarThrottle

But over the years there have been some cars that pushed the boundaries of the four-cylinder engine. Here are five of them.

The massive 2.8-litre Duramax turbo diesel engine was used by General Motors in the second-generation Chevrolet Colorado midsize pickup and also in the mechanically identical GMC Canyon. Based on an Italian engine from VM Motori that was first produced way back in 2001, the big Duramax was produced in Thailand after GM bought a stake in VM Motori and built a new Thai factory. It was designed more for fuel efficiency than outright performance, and pushed out 179bhp and 369lb ft. It was produced until 2022.

Porsche had long been playing with its M44 inline-four engine, which came into being in a Le Mans project in the early 80s and debuted in the 944 a year later as an already beefy 2.4-litre unit. But in 1989 Porsche bored it out to 3.0 litres, creating what was at the time the world’s largest four-cylinder production engine, and plonked it into the 944 S2. Naturally aspirated, the M44/41 engine developed 208bhp and 206lb ft of torque. Not only that, it was also more efficient and gave the driver better performance than the other engines in the 944 range. Performance wise, it could hit 60mph from standstill in 6.9 seconds, which wasn’t too shabby for the late 1980s. Downsides? The new engine wasn’t particularly tunable, unless you want to spend big money for relatively little gain.

In 1992, the 944’s successor arrived. The Porsche 968 had under its bonnet a reworked version of the M44 engine, now called the M44/12. The 3.0-litre capacity remained but power was now up to 237bhp in the standard 968. Upgrades included variable valve timing and a more sophisticated engine management system. When the 968 Turbo S appeared in 1993, it developed 305bhp thanks to, yes, you guessed it, a turbocharger. However, the Turbo S was as rare as hen’s teeth – only 14 were built. Porsche Motorsports also built racing versions, called the 968 Turbo RS, which pushed power up to 350bhp using an uprated KKK turbo.

The first-generation Pontiac Tempest was built from 1961 to 1963. A small (by American standards) family car, it was available with a couple of V8 choices, but also was the only car to feature the short-lived Trophy 4 engine. Essentially half of the 6.4-litre Trophy V8, the 3.2-litre four-cylinder was dreamt up by John DeLorean – yes, that one – and produced a whopping 110bhp, but could be boosted to 166bhp with various carburettor and fuel upgrades. The engine was noisy and unreliable – it was not a hit and was never used again.

Depending on who you ask, General Motors’ long-serving Iron Duke engine is either amazing, or one of the worst engines of all time. On the one hand, this 2.5-litre inline-four proved durable and reliable over more than 15 years across numerous GM brands. On the other hand, it was deathly dull, very basic and very noisy, at least in the early days. The Iron Duke was beloved by mechanics for its simplicity, but hated by petrolheads for its utter lack of charm. Whatever your opinion, it was a mainstay in US cars between 1977 and 1993. It might be the smallest engine on this list, but it must have been doing something right.

Don’t forget the Subaru EJ30, which couldn’t reach the production line. A 3.0 L

My friend Jakes 1986 Plymouth Conquest has a 2.6, that’s pretty cool I think. And it sounds great

Don’t forget Ford’s power stroke 3.0 tdi

I can think of many big displacement 4 pots in the diesels. It’s all in the stroke!

In reply to by The Stan

It’s all in the hips

I had an isuzu trooper with an inline 4, 3.1 turbo diesel biiig ol block

Well the Fiat doesnt sound good imo.

In reply to by Deus Robert Paulsen

Cummin’s 4bt 3.9 liter 4cylinder

you forgot the hj60 which has a 4l

5 Of The Highest Displacement 4-Cylinder Cars Ever Made | Feature | CarThrottle

Type 4 Cylinder The Ford Model T had a 177 cubic inch (2.9L) I4. Made a whopping 20hp but an impressive 80ft-lbs of torque.